Skylake i5 vs. Skylake Xeon for gaming?

Status
Not open for further replies.

JBDelta

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2014
388
0
18,910
Hey Guys!

Just wondering, Intel's new Skylake CPUs are out, which would be better for gaming, a Skylake i5 (6500-6600) or a Skylake Xeon (1220v5 or above). Definitely a CPU below $250 with the exception of the Haswell Xeon 1231v3, I will be playing games specifically Skyrim (heavily modded), BFBC2, BF3, BF4, and Steam games like WarFace and Dirty Bomb. I will also a lot of recording and editing.

Thanks in advance!
 


The Xeon he mentioned supports socket LGA 1151. You can get gaming motherboards that work with it.
 

iamacow

Admirable
Xeon is only if you plan on using ECC RAM and running mission critical work. Most companies buy them for severs, not in desktop computers these days.

You are paying more for a slower cpu and inability to overclock.

Get an Xeon If...

-You NEED ECC Ram
-Want 2 CPUs (dual socket)
-Want more than the normal amount of cores
-Run lots of VMware / Networking

To clarify the Xeon is the same as the i5/i7s just with less things disabled. Usually lower TDP/ CPU clocks for servers (hence locked multiplier). You will benefit way more from a desktop cpu than any Xeon under $1000
 

JBDelta

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2014
388
0
18,910
"Xeon is only if you plan on using ECC RAM and running mission critical work. Most companies buy them for severs, not in desktop computers these days.

You are paying more for a slower cpu and inability to overclock.

Get an Xeon If...

-You NEED ECC Ram
-Want 2 CPUs (dual socket)
-Want more than the normal amount of cores
-Run lots of VMware / Networking"

So basically, what LinusTechTips said about the Xeons being good budget options with similar performance to the i7 CPUs is a joke???
 

iamacow

Admirable
I forgot to add that if you want to buy the old Xeons from the X79 2011 socket (not 2011v3). you have get 8 and 10 core cpus for less than $500 on ebay. That will be a boost over a 4core cpu. downside is they run at lower clocks (like 2.5ghz) so you need apps that really use more than 1 thread/core or your games will preform worse.

Interesting enough BF4 is the only game on your list that uses more than 2 cores. So in your case Mhz rules over cores. 4.0ghz will stomp a 2.5ghz in games if only 2 cores are being used. BUT those extra cores can be used for recording video and encoding in real time.
 

iamacow

Admirable


Linus is a joke haha. Half the things he says on that youtube channel is wrong. I cracks me up watching him build that server and not knowing two things about ram when he spent 2k on it.
 
From info so far, the skylake xeons were made not compatible with consumer chipsets. So the i5 build would be a little cheaper on mobo and a little more performance with a slightly higher clock. The k cpu will be best for games with an oc but the performance is already high enough on all the cpus, it may not matter. You'd also spend more on mobo and cooler.
 

iamacow

Admirable



well you get two different series there. the 6000 is for the 1151 socket and the 4000 is for the 1150 socket. different chipsets and sockets...and ram
 
The I7-6700K ($419) is a 4.0Ghz quad core with 8 threads. If you want the hyper threading, it has the features you want. The Xeon E3-1231V3 ($249) is a 3.4Ghz LGA 1150 socket processor. It is also a quad core processor with 8 threads. And finally the I5-6600k ($270) is also a quad core processor with 4 threads and runs at 3.5 Ghz. So the Xeon E3-1231V3 and I5-6600k are most similar (with the exception of hyper threading). And the difference in price is minimal at $21. I would suggest the I5-660K processor as your best choice

The I7-6700K is an extra $149, but you get a hyper threading and a 4.0 Ghz processor speed. This is the one I would choose if you can afford the extra cost. If I talk my self into a new build, this is probably the processor I will build my new system around.



Intel Core i7-6700K 8M Skylake Quad-Core 4.0 GHz LGA 1151 95W BX80662I76700K Desktop Processor Intel® HD Graphics 530
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117559


Intel Xeon E3-1231V3 Haswell 3.4 GHz 4 x 256KB L2 Cache 8MB L3 Cache LGA 1150 80W BX80646E31231V3 Server Processor
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117316

Intel Core i5-6600K 6M Skylake Quad-Core 3.5 GHz LGA 1151 95W BX80662I56600K Desktop Processor Intel HD Graphics 530

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117561
 
I've read through all this and I'm a little confused. Here's my experience.

I replaced my LGA 1150 i5 4590 with a Xeon 1231v3 to handle fluid dynamics and molecular modelling software better, as well as to game. The gamin performance is about the same. I don't notice any difference. The computation is about 45% faster with the extra hyperthreads.

Today, in the USA, looking only at CPUs.

Xeon 1231v3 $228
i5 6500 $185
i5 6600 $205

i5 6600K $255
i7 6700K $420

For gaming only the i5 6500 wins price-performance and the infrastructure, motherboard and RAM, is only a little more.
When you throw lots of editing and recording into the mix, the Xeon moves into the lead if you editing software will use enough threads (and most software does)

Overclocking will get you more performance but not more threads unless you go to the i7 6700K and the infrastructure build up too with better motherboards, power supplies and faster memory.

From what you have said, the Xeon is the price/performance choice.
 

JBDelta

Distinguished
Aug 13, 2014
388
0
18,910
Okay, well I definitely can't pick i7 6700k because that would just blow my budget 3 times over so I guess that narrows it down to the i5 4460, i5 4590, i5 6500, i5 4690k, and Xeon 1231v3. I might be able to throw in a GTX 970 if I go with the 4460 but benchmarks are showing that the i5 6500 is performing almost identically to the i5 4690k and in some the 6500 even pulls ahead, is this due to the 6500 being part of the new Skylake series? (Because it's 14nm????)
 
*Hey.. some confusion here:
http://ark.intel.com/products/80910/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E3-1231-v3-8M-Cache-3_40-GHz

1) The number to compare is the TURBO value which is 3.8GHz. Any time the CPU is heavily stressed it will stay at that value, not at 3.4GHz.

2) http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/11

The XEON is not overclockable (AFAIK) and is slightly slower than the i7-4770K by about 3%. So just use that i7 to compare at stock.

*In the benchmark note the multithread Cinebench test shows the i7-4770K and i5-6600K are similar (the i7-6700K at the top). So the Skylake architecture is doing quite well.

**In 7-zip the hyperthreading helps but at the same time the new Skylake architecture is obviously benefitting Cinebench quite a lot (but not 7-zip), so it's very difficult to determine which processor is "best" overall though I personally would get the i5-6600K.

If confused, know that there is a lot of back and forth so either way you'll end up with a great system, plus it depends how much you can save overall with the Skylake vs Haswell platform.

Summary:
Study the benchmarks, use the i7-4770K at stock for reference in place of XEON.

Optimizing for Skylake can benefit quite a lot vs Haswell. Pros and cons.

Update:
Recent Windows 10 lets Skylake use "Speed Shift" which toggles the CPU cores in and out of low power state faster than previous. I don't know how much it benefits normal desktop usage, though Ryan at PCPER did an experiment that showed scrolling a mobile browser up and down was snappier (cores started in 6ms instead of about 60ms from wake on Haswell).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.