Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Guild wars 2 vs Everquest next

Tags:
  • Mmorpg
  • Video Games
  • RPG
  • Graphics
Last response: in Video Games
Share
4 August 2014 13:45:01

Which is better?and which one has better graphics?and which one have better gameplay content? *i know ever quest next is not released yet*but when will it be released?

More about : guild wars everquest

4 August 2014 14:50:45

AFAIK, next still hasn't got a release date. It's still in landmark phase, where people can pay to get early access and help shaping the game world.

Seen and tried (free 3-days period off a friend) GW2 however, I'd say it's an...uncommon game, maybe. Rather than focusing on extreme grinding, it's more about exploration, questing, gathering, crafting and trading. Character creation and class choices are kind of limited although, not to mention skills depend on your equipped weapon and on your expertise with it (by the end of the first area, you can max them all out), so it might get repetitive from that point of view.
Not a game I'd buy honestly, but it's worth a try.

On the gameplay content account, it's too early to say, while on the graphical account it's too subjective. GW2 features pseudo-realistic textures, while next will be using a lot of cell shading...
In the end, it's down to which one you prefer over the other
m
0
l
4 August 2014 16:16:22

Or you might want to check out ArcheAge, the closed beta is over today, but it looks really really good to me. Lots of classes (120), professions (21), you can chain certain skills into combos, naval combat PVP all this running on Cryengine 3. Honestly I was surprised how good the game was and it will be free to play when it launches later on this year.
m
0
l
Related resources
4 August 2014 17:24:58

It will take a while before archeage comes into open beta, provided they won't do any more closed ones...not to mention that, at least by judging from videos, it doesn't look anything special...same old "click enemy, spam hotkey"...

Also, I didn't know it was on CryEngine 3... That would make it quite taxing on older or not performant systems.
m
0
l
4 August 2014 18:22:45

i don't know why but i didn't like archeage it's graphics/gameplay are bad no anime only texture that not moves something like graphics are lack:| is anybody here like me?i think gw2 has better graphics
m
0
l
4 August 2014 18:32:08

Actually, if it was on CryEngine 3, it would mean it has better resources and graphics than GW2, and from the videos ArcheAge looks pretty nice, maybe on par if not higher than it.

That, however, always comes down to personal tastes, as I said before. I, for one, think that GW2 graphics are ok, but I liked the ones from TERA a lot more than them. ArcheAge kinda gives me the same feeling as GW2, just with slightly more freedom in movesets, a better rendered game world and a more common, grind-ish gameplay with flashy skill effects.
m
0
l
19 August 2014 16:12:21

AA VS EQN?which is betteR?
m
0
l
softly