Page 1:TDP, RAM Performance, and APUs
Page 2:Ryzen 2, Wraith Coolers, and Infinity Fabric
Page 3:Versus Kaby Lake, FreeSync TVs, and Frame Latency
Page 4:Cooler Brackets, Gaming, and Console Lessons
Page 5:Project Scorpio, Versus Core i5, and ECC
Page 6:X399 Motherboard, Ryzen 5 Launch BIOS, and DDR5
Page 7:Enterprise, Best GPUs, CCX Latency, and Scheduling
Page 8:Mobile, Naming Scheme, and Naples
Page 9:Best Gaming Processor, Clock Speeds, and Development
Page 10:Update Schedule, 1600X Microarchitecture, and Optane
Page 11:M.2 Performance, FreeSync Vs G-Sync, and CCX Performance
Page 12:Tweaks & Support, Power Plan, and Game Benchmarks
Last week AMD joined us for a very special Ryzen AMA. Dive into our lengthy digest to learn about the past, present, and future of Ryzen.
First off, let's give a big thank you to AMD for stopping by to answer all the insightful questions presented by our community members. Scheduling this AMA took a bit of work on their end, especially during such a busy launch year, and for that, the Community Staff as well as our readers are much obliged to everyone at AMD for taking the time to engage with the enthusiastic members of our community.
And of course, we're deeply appreciative of Don Woligroski for the in-depth responses given to each question posted by the Community. We'd also like to thank Sam Tehrani and Erin Maiorino for all their help putting this together.
Want to read the AMA in its original format? You can check out the original thread here. While you're there make sure to enter our second and final giveaway for the ASRock X370 Taichi AM4 Motherboard. Below you'll find the AMA in its entirety, formatted for your convenience and edited for clarity.
Our AMA With AMD
turkey3_scratch: When it comes to TDP, how exactly are the values created? I notice both the Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X are labeled as a 95W TDP, however, there are differences in the frequency between the two, and looking at the data on these processors I would think the 1700X would use less power than the 1800X. How come the TDPs are the same?
Do you think the current TDPs for these processors best exemplify average power under maximum load (i.e. torture test) or a typical heavy load (i.e. gaming)? Do you think any more data relating to the power of these processors would be helpful to consumers under the specifications, such as the peaks in an oscilloscope graph?
A lot of people like to overclock but when overclocking the TDP no longer is the same and requires some guesswork. Do you think there could be some form of data presented to consumers that could tell them more about the power requirements of the processor if they overclock to certain amounts and voltages, or do you think it's too unpredictable and/or best left to third party sites' independent testing?
DON WOLIGROSKI: This is a can of worms, but I'll do my best. A couple points to frame the conversation:
1. TDP is not electrical watts (power draw), it's thermal watts.
2. Published processor TDPs are often rounded up to fit a desired specification. For example, AM4 motherboards are specd to run processors with 65W and 95W TDPs. It gives motherboard manufacturers and system builders a thermal framework to fit within. At AMD we call the Ryzen 7 1800X, Ryzen 7 1700X, and Ryzen 5 1600X 95W processors, but in practice there might be a couple of thermal watts difference during operation due to a number of factors.
So right off the bat, power draw conclusions based on processor TDPs are probably not going to be perfect, although they can give you a rough idea.
To be frank, people tend to overspec the heck out of their PSUs. Primarily I think important to look for a well-reviewed model from a reliable manufacturer, rather than to worry about processor power draw on 95W Ryzen CPUs. Heck, 125W FX processors tend to run fine on a decent 450W juice box from my experience, but Igor at Tom's Hardware frankly knows a hell of a lot more than I ever will about PSUs. He's your guy when it comes to power draw.
James Mason: Will AMD eventually be able to fix the RAM clock speed issues through software updates alone?
DON WOLIGROSKI: As long as there isn't a physical motherboard hardware limitation, we are absolutely able to address RAM performance improvements through the motherboard BIOS.
Some perspective here - Socket AM4 is brand new, and our first DDR4 socket. Our competition took a year to get the RAM speed and stability they enjoy, but in the month since we launched Ryzen 7 we've gone from testing our original data at 2400 MHz to giving Ryzen 5 reviewers stable 3200 MHz B350 platforms to test with thanks to BIOS updates. Consumers can expect those updated BIOSes to arrive for X370 motherboards in the Ryzen 5 launch time frame around April 11th for X370 boards.
That's not to say we've achieved perfection in a month. We still have a lot more work to do on the AM4 platform, but the strides we've already taken are incredible. We're also tracking toward another BIOS update in May to help with overclocked memory stability and performance even more, and we have a standing team of people working to develop this indefinitely.
The best part of this is, memory speed is a big piece of the platform, and rears its head in platform-limited applications like games running at the relatively-low 1080p resolution. So we're really happy about the improvements we've made, and this is definitely a priority for us going forward.
imrazor: How will you price the lowest end 4 core, 8 thread Ryzen 3 processor?
DON WOLIGROSKI: We haven't disclosed any Ryzen 3 pricing yet, but you can probably where prices will be relative to Ryzen 5. I'm also sure we haven't announced a 4c/8t version, Ryzen 3 specs will be revealed later.
Sorry, wish I could say more. But I invite you to enjoy the 4c/8t Ryzen 5 1400 when it's released on the 11th at a suggested price of $169 USD!
atljsf: Now that AM4 motherboards support APUs, what kind of APUs can we expect? Will they have 4 cores and 4 threads? Perhaps 4 cores and 8 threads? Do you have any information of TDP limit? Will they hit 65 Watts TDP?
DON WOLIGROSKI: I can't comment on unannounced products and specifications, but the Ryzen-based APUs will be awesome. That is all I can say.
redgarl: With Nvidia pursuing self-driving car opportunities and Intel looking at Optane, is there a new focus for AMD in the upcoming future?
DON WOLIGROSKI: Optane: The elephant in the room is that Intel has made a very expensive cache drive available. Remember the first SSDs? Been there, done that. It says something that they don't recommend Optane for users who already have an SSD as their primary drive.
As for AMD, our finger is definitely on the pulse of storage tech. Of course I can't comment on unannounced products, so if we did have something in the works I couldn't talk about it.
MORE: Best CPUs
MORE: All CPU Content
- TDP, RAM Performance, and APUs
- Ryzen 2, Wraith Coolers, and Infinity Fabric
- Versus Kaby Lake, FreeSync TVs, and Frame Latency
- Cooler Brackets, Gaming, and Console Lessons
- Project Scorpio, Versus Core i5, and ECC
- X399 Motherboard, Ryzen 5 Launch BIOS, and DDR5
- Enterprise, Best GPUs, CCX Latency, and Scheduling
- Mobile, Naming Scheme, and Naples
- Best Gaming Processor, Clock Speeds, and Development
- Update Schedule, 1600X Microarchitecture, and Optane
- M.2 Performance, FreeSync Vs G-Sync, and CCX Performance
- Tweaks & Support, Power Plan, and Game Benchmarks