AMD Phenom: Up to 27 Watts During Standby
Before we get to the comparison tests of all the AMD processors, we would like to talk about a problem with the Phenom processor. During our testing, we found out that, in comparison to all other AMD CPUs, the Phenom has a very high power draw during standby. Even when Cool’n’Quiet mode is activated, depending on which motherboard is used, the energy intake is almost three times higher.
The Phenom 9600 processor switches down to a clock rate of 1150 MHz during standby mode. Its multiplier then becomes 5.8x and the core voltage goes down to 1.050 V.
In order to find out where the processor’s high power intake comes from, we measured our Phenom 9600 Black Edition on AMD 790FX boards from Asus, Gigabyte and MSI.

In our opinion, the electrical intakes of all three motherboards are too high to be acceptable. We measured 27.69 W on the Gigabyte board, while the MSI board achieved 20.27 W, which at its best is twice as much as the Athlon 64 X2 6400+.
Surprisingly, there is a difference of up to 7.4 W between the MSI and Gigabyte motherboards. While the MSI motherboard has a 5-phase regulator and the Gigabyte board is equipped with a 10-phase regulator, it’s unlikely that the Gigabyte’s additional 5-phase regulator uses more than 7.4 watts. There is the possibility that the Phenom doesn’t switch down to a lower voltage properly, which cannot be detected with classic diagnostic tools like CPU-Z, Core-Temp or Everest.
The Phenom 9600 needs up to 20.27 watts during standby, even with Cool’n’Quiet mode turned on. With the Gigabyte board it even goes up to 27.69 W. When compared to the Athlon 64 X2 6400+, the electrical intake is simply too high.
Latest CPU News
- 10/02 – CPU Performance Boosted 20% When CPU, GPU Collaborate
- 10/02 – Leaked Slide Shows Intel Haswell Set for March-June 2013
- 09/02 – $100,000 If You Can Prove Quantum Computers Impossible
- 09/02 – AMD Adds FM1 CPUs Athlon II X4 638 and Athlon II X4 641
- 08/02 – Raspberry Pi Scheduled to Launch This Month


my media centre based on a 3700+ (S939, single core san diego, 1MB, 2.2GHz) only uses 56-58W while running rosetta@home! That's including 1.25GB DDR (3 sticks), a freeview TV tuner, and a 2GB compactflash card on a Seasonic S12 330W PSU. It's undervolted as far as it'd go though...
What about performance per watt comparisons, which would have been the best comparison you could have made in such an article.
If you had a system that consumed 300W of power (forget about idle and full load differences for this question!!) with a 500W PSU, what would your power consumption be for the purpose of energy bill calculation?
Am I correct in believing that the rating of your PSU is the maximum power it can supply, and that it only actually draws what the system asks for? So in this case, your overall system power use would be 300W?
So, if you install a much more powerful PSU than you currently need (for the sake of future SLI upgrades) you wouldn't be wasting electricity?