Benchmark Results
Gaming Benchmarks
Deep Fritz 10 Chess shows a slight performance increase. Remember that this applications scales beautifully with more CPU cores, so it performs much better with Phenom on four cores than on Athlon 64 X2 on two.
Frame rates are 11% faster with a single core Phenom when compared to a single core Athlon 64 X2.
5
Comments
Sponsored
Latest CPU News
- 24/05 – Nvidia to Push Tablet Prices to $199 With Kai Platform
- 23/05 – AMD Backing Out of CPU Speed Wars Against Intel
- 22/05 – AMD Hitting The Casino Floor With Embedded R-Series
- 22/05 – Does Your AMD FX Platform BSOD with Steam? Read This.
- 20/05 – Intel To Support Cheap Ultrabooks With Low-Cost Celerons
Latest CPU reviews
- 24/05 – Overclocking Core i7-3770K: Learning To Live With Compromise
- 22/05 – Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
- 15/05 – AMD A10-4600M Review: Mobile Trinity Gets Tested
- 14/05 – Core i7-3720QM: Ivy Bridge Makes Its Mark On Mobility
- 23/04 – Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up From Sandy Bridge
Interesting, but by only using one core it doesn't give a decent real world test
I'd have like to have seen a real 'upgrade' comparison, eg divx encoding on an x2 vs phenom to give me some idea if it's worth the money
not realy the Point of this test was to show how real world apps perform in Single threded apps
was hopeing anandtech did this but thay used Faster X2 amd chips so there was No point at all included them results unless thay had the same clocked chips as well
and thay have all ready done (or other sites have any way) done divx tests but like i sad before thay needed to inclued same clocked X2 chips as well
untill X4 3ghz cpus are out or can run at it 2.6ghz X4 performs like an 2.7-2.9ghz X2 cpu (apart from when more then 2 cores are used then it smoke all X2 chips no mater what clock speed thay run at, Divix for e.g.)
DAAMIT I'm now in limbo, wanting to upgrade, but not really sure if i should..... (actually i'm pretty sure that I shouldn't)
I still maintain these are better products than Intel's C2Q. A real-world testing using heavy multi-tasking would show the benefits of a monolithic design and in a cluster environment this would simply win hands down, since inter-core bandwidth is essential. Intel's offerings concentrate on nstructions per clock - not bandwidth.
8 of these cores when used in a server would blow away Intel; the memory latency and HTT 2.0/3.0 interconnect would be leaps ahead. Intel cannot fit monolithic cores onto a single die as the design is flawed.
When are we gonna see 128-bit SIMD instructions to really show off what this can do?
I urge you all to check out this review http://www.lostcircuits.com/cpu/amd_phenom/ on lost circuits and direct you to the multithreading benchmarks F.E.A.R and especially UT3.
All isn't lost for AMD