Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Overclocking

by

Overclocking on 790GX takes a slightly different form that it did on any previous AMD-based chipset as a direct result of the Advanced Clock Calibration feature introduced with the SB750 southbridge. Rather than simply tweaking and tuning multipliers, interconnect speeds, voltages, and timings, there’s one step interjected between running at stock speeds and picking an overclocking target.

Mainly, that step involves enabling ACC, either through a motherboard BIOS or using the OverDrive utility, and choosing a “value” corresponding to ACC. The value in question ranges from -12% to +12% and starts at zero. What exactly does it represent? Good question — AMD is staying deliberately quiet on the exact definition. However, all indications point to the loosening and tightening of tolerances. With a Phenom X4 9950 or 9850, AMD recommends opening ACC up to +2% or so. A slower chip, like an older 9600, might be able to withstand +4% or +6%. You get the idea.

AMD says that ACC will help improve the overclocking headroom of any Phenom chip, though it recommends Black Edition CPUs most highly. Perhaps that’s because it can be so challenging to get stable overclocks out of the HT reference clock alone.

With ACC turned on and set to the “margin” of your choosing, it’s business as usual. Drop down into OverDrive and start tweaking the settings you’d normally use to tune your processor. It’s a good idea to start with a good reference point if you’re really interested in the effects of ACC. We went with a Phenom X4 9850 that, prior to ACC and installed in a Gigabyte MA790FX-DQ6, wouldn’t break past 2.8 GHz using stock cooling and voltages as high as 1.35V.

3.33 GHz on stock cooling—not bad.3.33 GHz on stock cooling—not bad.

Skepticism was swept aside when, on the Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H and using a 1.35V setting, we were able to hit 3.28 GHz with a 205 MHz HT ref. clock. AMD claims ACC will buy most processors between 100 and 400 MHz on top of what they could do sans ACC. Our 430 MHz (beyond 2.8 GHz) overclock falls right in line with those results. After taking a lot of heat for less than stellar scalability, 700+ MHz tweaks should earn AMD’s Black Edition CPUs quite a bit more respect in the overclocking community — so long as ACC doesn’t turn out to make an impact on stability over the long term.

We tried playing with different ACC values (4% and 6%), but didn’t notice any appreciable improvement in headroom. Although we were able to operate well into the 3.3 GHz range, the system didn’t take long to crash once a load was applied to it. With a larger cooler and a bit more juice, 3.4 GHz would have likely been achievable.

Share:
10
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
Anonymous 06/08/2008 10:24
Hide
-2+

well done, yet another screwed up article

Toms has become a pathetic shambles

Anonymous 06/08/2008 11:19
Hide
-2+

i agree, this site is rubbish since the takeover.

all the news is linked from other sources, double posts of articles on the front page, and articles not fully hosted.

Seriously, whoever runs this site needs to sort themselves out.

I would be fired if i allowed our website to get in this sort of mess.

Anonymous 06/08/2008 11:37
Hide
-1+

I know, and I pay so much for this site as well...

paradigital 06/08/2008 11:48
Hide
-0+

I've been saying this for months now, and had most of my comments removed.

Why is this article posted twice on the front page, at two different times?

Why does the "northbridge table" on page 2 have no headder row? Which chipset is which?

Tom's Hardware used to be utterly superb, the only place I wanted to read my hardware news. Now I'm lucky if its written in coherent English, let alone factually correct and well presented!

In short, THG fails... hard.

uk_gangsta 06/08/2008 13:55
Hide
-0+

LOL this article sucks more than paris hilton.......

Anonymous 06/08/2008 14:34
Hide
-0+

Umm, where is the rest of the article?

THG has fallen more than I ever thought possible! Guess I'll bugger off back to Hexus....

Anonymous 06/08/2008 15:50
Hide
-0+

yeah it's quite disappointing to see Toms go downhill like this

bjornlo 07/08/2008 10:44
Hide
-0+

I thought this was an interesting article. I have complained about some of the others in recent past.... for example the nonsense one about Paint Shop's little brother.
But, it was easy to figure out which column related to which chipset, but when you make a stupid mistake like that it would be nice to go back and fix it.
I do not think the site is better nor worse since the take-over. It was never perfect. I think it is fine. It remains in my bookmarks. If you don't like it now, hang out at Anand's, hardocp, arstechnica, or overclockers.com or one of the many other decent places.

jonisginger 07/08/2008 18:38
Hide
-0+

I agree. :(

lewis999 08/08/2008 14:30
Hide
-0+

lol i agree with most of you :D , anyways , can someone tell me why vga charts aint been updated for 10 years lol? (a bit of exagerations if you didnt notice ) but where are the Geforce 9 series , guru3d has em why not toms?

Best offers

Newsletters


OK