Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

AMD's Slides Showing That It's Faster Than Intel

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Those are some mighty fine numbers you've got there, AMD.

Last week when AMD officially launched its new ultrathin mobile platform codename Congo and the mainstream notebook platform codename Tigris, the chipmaker also provided in its marketing material benchmark charts showing what it believes are key performance advantages over Intel's offerings.

While we won't be able to confirm any of these performance characteristics until we get our hands on test platforms, but if these numbers are true – particularly for the ultrathin category – then we're excited to see competition in the mobile segment.

AMD Turion X2 Neo L625 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300

AMD configurationIntel configuration

AMD Turion II Ultra M640 vs. Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

AMD configurationIntel configuration

Share:
6
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
Clintonio 15/09/2009 12:03
Hide
--2+

This article is mostly pictures, no words. How about a summary of each image before submitting the article?

Not everyone here is on landline broadband and can afford waiting for images to load for like, 5 minutes.

Low quality article. Please delete.

Anonymous 15/09/2009 01:27
Hide
-2+

You can't make your own conclusions from those graphs?

aron311 15/09/2009 04:00
Hide
-0+

AMD are clearly better.

jimishtar 15/09/2009 12:53
Hide
-0+

I'm pretty sure the Empire will strike back.

atomdrift 15/09/2009 18:16
Hide
-0+

HAHA Clint. What is it with people thinking they're the de facto editors of these news feeds.

fyro11 15/09/2009 22:14
Hide
-0+

Hold on a minute: with the ultrathin (Congo), the clock speed of the test processor is 1.6Ghz dualcore, whereas the Intel is 1.2Ghz. Big difference. And productivity (a.k.a. speed?) with the AMD ultrathin looks like a load of tosh due to that.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK