Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Acer Chief Says There Are Too Many PC Companies

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

For Acer, it's just basic business.

Acer’s chief executive Gianfranco Lanci expressed in a recent interview that he feels that there is too much competition in the PC market. More specifically, he believes that fewer players in the PC making market would lead to greater profits.

While that may sound like Business 101, Lanci took his insight further by saying that companies such as Acer need to look at buying out other computer companies in order to become more profitable.

"This can be a very good industry in terms of making profits if you think about there being four or five players instead of seven or eight as you see today," Mr. Lanci said to the New York Times. "There is not enough profit in the chain to maintain all these players today."

Lanci's logic is that though acquisitions, companies will become larger and thus be able to negotiate for better prices for computer components from suppliers and builders Quanta and Compal.

Acer's already played the buying game with its acquisitions of eMachines, Gateway and Packard Bell, which may have played a part in the company's rise now to rival Dell for the number two spot worldwide, behind Hewlett-Packard.

One thing is for certain, and that is Acer's not afraid to manage different brands it acquires as long as it's the same force pulling the strings in the background.

Lanci said in a previous interview, "One brand is almost impossible, if you want the right product and precision for the right customer profile."

From the sound of the Lanci's statements, Acer isn't finished yet on its mergers and acquisitions roll. While he wouldn't confirm what the company's next move may be, he did add, "I think we need to be part of this consolidation in some way."

Share:
5
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
Anonymous 09/07/2009 04:20
Hide
-0+

well of course there would be if they did some BASIC economics

waxdart 09/07/2009 10:32
Hide
-0+

If there are too many companies they will go bust!

If the companies bust their balls to win business and give the customer the best product ever and just be able to make a profit. They win and get to be number one and make money.

Too many is a good thing.

massec 09/07/2009 11:56
Hide
-0+

Too be honest i would never by a pc made or associated with acer. Several of my friends have, thinking they are getting the best deal, only to find it breaks on just out of their warranty or in such a way it won't be replaced.

The more companies there are the more companies need to strive for customers, whats bad about that?

Nick_C 09/07/2009 14:40
Hide
-0+

Sounds like wanting to make more money for doing the same (by reducing customer choice) or same money for doing less....

As has already been said, many suppliers is good (for the customer) and those with the best performance / spec / price combo will do well.

jaragon13 13/07/2009 12:47
Hide
-0+

"too much competition"
"lead to greater profits."
"This can be a very good industry in terms of making profits if you think about there being four or five players instead of seven or eight as you see today,"
"played the buying game with its acquisitions of eMachines, Gateway and Packard Bell,"
Lol, LET'S MONOPOLIZE UP IN HAR AND WE MAKE BETTER PROFITS
Where the hell does the customer come in this? Gateway is the only reasonable namebrand producer, if that, for gaming systems.(save Asus and MSI)
Though I couldn't really care less about eMachines they only make cheapo desktops w/ the worst peforming components nowadays

Best offers

Newsletters


OK