Acer Chief Says There Are Too Many PC Companies
For Acer, it's just basic business.
Acer’s chief executive Gianfranco Lanci expressed in a recent interview that he feels that there is too much competition in the PC market. More specifically, he believes that fewer players in the PC making market would lead to greater profits.
While that may sound like Business 101, Lanci took his insight further by saying that companies such as Acer need to look at buying out other computer companies in order to become more profitable.
"This can be a very good industry in terms of making profits if you think about there being four or five players instead of seven or eight as you see today," Mr. Lanci said to the New York Times. "There is not enough profit in the chain to maintain all these players today."
Lanci's logic is that though acquisitions, companies will become larger and thus be able to negotiate for better prices for computer components from suppliers and builders Quanta and Compal.
Acer's already played the buying game with its acquisitions of eMachines, Gateway and Packard Bell, which may have played a part in the company's rise now to rival Dell for the number two spot worldwide, behind Hewlett-Packard.
One thing is for certain, and that is Acer's not afraid to manage different brands it acquires as long as it's the same force pulling the strings in the background.
Lanci said in a previous interview, "One brand is almost impossible, if you want the right product and precision for the right customer profile."
From the sound of the Lanci's statements, Acer isn't finished yet on its mergers and acquisitions roll. While he wouldn't confirm what the company's next move may be, he did add, "I think we need to be part of this consolidation in some way."
- acer ,
- competition ,
- prices ,
- companies ,
- profits
- OP: Is There a Difference Between Google & MSFT?
- Google Announces Chrome Operating System
- QOTD: What Determines Your Upgrade Cycle?
- No LAN for Diablo III Too?
- Bing is Growing Out of Beta Too
- Google Apps Crawl Out of Beta Status, Finally
- Microsoft Warns Users of 'Zero Day' Security Issue
- Dell Could Face Fines For Recent Price Errors
- Sony Finally Caves, Launches Netbook
- Why Blizzard Should Enable LAN to SC2/D3
- Microsoft's Laptop Hunters Returns, $700 PC Wins
- Asus Eee Keyboard Taken Apart and Explored
- Google Announces Chrome OS Partners
- Google: Yes, the Chrome OS Will Be Free
- Leaked: First Images of Chrome OS? (Not)
- QOTD: How Much Are Google's Services Worth?
- Windows 7 Family Pack Priced at $20-$30 More?
- Watch the Flashy Office 2010: The Movie Trailer






well of course there would be if they did some BASIC economics
If there are too many companies they will go bust!
If the companies bust their balls to win business and give the customer the best product ever and just be able to make a profit. They win and get to be number one and make money.
Too many is a good thing.
Too be honest i would never by a pc made or associated with acer. Several of my friends have, thinking they are getting the best deal, only to find it breaks on just out of their warranty or in such a way it won't be replaced.
The more companies there are the more companies need to strive for customers, whats bad about that?
Sounds like wanting to make more money for doing the same (by reducing customer choice) or same money for doing less....
As has already been said, many suppliers is good (for the customer) and those with the best performance / spec / price combo will do well.
"too much competition"
"lead to greater profits."
"This can be a very good industry in terms of making profits if you think about there being four or five players instead of seven or eight as you see today,"
"played the buying game with its acquisitions of eMachines, Gateway and Packard Bell,"
Lol, LET'S MONOPOLIZE UP IN HAR AND WE MAKE BETTER PROFITS
Where the hell does the customer come in this? Gateway is the only reasonable namebrand producer, if that, for gaming systems.(save Asus and MSI)
Though I couldn't really care less about eMachines they only make cheapo desktops w/ the worst peforming components nowadays