Categories:

SiSoft Sandra

02:19 - Monday 15 October 2007 by The editorial team
Source: THG – Keywords: XPS, M1730, Alienware
Categories: Gaming, Mobile

SiSoft Sandra

Ad


Sandra 2005’s two CPU benchmarks both benefit by over 20% for the XPS M1730’s 20% faster CPU clock, with an additional 7% gained when the CPU is overclocked by 7%.

Both systems use the same memory speed, but Sandra Memory Bandwidth gains 20% from the XPS M1730’s 20% faster CPU front-side bus.


Talkback
americanbrian 16/10/2007 02:28
Hide
-0+
americanbrian
Dell XPS's are nice, but to be fair the application performance is irrelevant. The huge cost of these are only justified by the gaming performance.

In this the Low Res gaming, doesn't matter a toss either. Alienware probably have better build quality. Do you notice as well that only the dell got the look inside and out. Biased article. If you have a choice never buy dell.
sewje 16/10/2007 04:18
Hide
-0+
sewje
I don't understand why you would bench compare the two machines with two different operating systems. This make the whole comparision between them very inaccurate.
At least use the same os configuration if you want to compare benchmarks between the two.

A very unprofessional article.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



  •
Submit my comment
Google Ads