Conclusion and Score
In terms of actual packaging, I did pick up the Collector’s Edition for this review, and was happy to see that Epic went with a tin case, and provided a nice little hardbound art book to boot. After some of the more recent, and disappointing Collector’s Editions, Epic and Midway at least went ahead and made sure to at least give gamers a little something extra with their Collector’s Editions. All that’s missing is a rebate for the owners of previous versions.
In the end, Unreal Tournament 3 is what we’re stuck with for our next generation Unreal Tournament needs. Epic has been unusually supportive of their previous games in the past, and hopefully they will release additional content, and even game modes for free as time goes on. This is assuming that Epic does not get stuck on the Xbox money train, by looking to release packs for points on Live while giving the PC platform a blind eye. Time will tell, but as Unreal Tournament 3 stands in the present, it’s a moderately good update to an established franchise, but it could have been, or even should have been, much more feature-rich and polished.

UT3 doesn’t haven enough multiplayer modes and new features to make the game live up to the UT franchise.
Where I’m Coming From: I spend the majority of my time playing multiplayer FPS and RTS, although I have been known to occasionally play through single player in the rare exceptions of games which are hyped up to be truly brilliant or games which simply pull me in upon first play. Bioshock, Call of Duty 4, and Clive Barker’s Jericho are the most recent titles that earned a play through on a single player level, all which delivered a satisfying experience. The biggest adrenaline rush in gaming, however, comes from interacting with others online, and handing out some punishment, which I do on a daily basis. Lately, I’ve spent a ton of time with Call of Duty 4, Crysis, Team Fortress 2, and Enemy Territory: Quake Wars online.
What I Compared It To: I compared Unreal Tournament 3 to the previous Unreal Tournament games, including the most recent Unreal Tournament 2004, as well as games like Painkiller, Quake 3, Quake 4, Battlefield 2142, and Enemy Territory: Quake Wars. Due to the single player and multiplayer aspect, I also had to consider the single player campaigns of each. I expected Unreal Tournament 3 to offer some sort of story progression like Quake 4, especially after the opening cinematics. In terms of multiplayer, Unreal Tournament 3 is a bit of a mixed bag, which is why I had to consider other vehicle and objective point-based games on top of deathmatch types. Multiplayer consideration made up the majority of my comparisons, as I realize that this is where most gamers will spend the majority of their time.
What I Liked: I enjoyed the new vehicles, especially the Darkwalker tripod, the cloaking and trap laying Nightshade, and the speedy suicide vehicle known as the Viper. Some of the maps are memorable and offer a lot of replay-ability, although with the voting system in place on almost all servers, a lot of the favourites continue to be replayed too often. The new items are cool, especially those which you can set as an individual or within a vehicle like the Nightshade. The graphics engine overhaul is nice, although I questioned if it created some of the limitations of flight. Retaining the frantic speed and pace of previous UT games was also a big plus. The sound quality and music are great.
What I Didn’t Like: The single player campaign most of all; it really should have been approached in a different manner, or just left out all together. Instead of having a single player campaign, Epic could have given gamers so much more in terms of retaining previously introduced game modes, and creating additional ones. The UI is a joke coming from the likes of Epic, and the server browser really needs an update. The maps are relatively well designed but I would have liked to see some of the old ones recycled as well.
Value Meter: If Epic goes on to introduce additional content over time, perhaps my opinion will change, but as it stands as it is on store shelves, Unreal Tournament 3 really should have been more than it was.
Final Score: 8.0 out of 10
- Gaming,
- Unreal ,
- Tournament ,
- 3
Latest Miscellaneous News
- 09/02 – Google Could be Planning a Retail Store in Dublin
- 08/02 – Anonymous Hacks Syrian President; His Password Was 12345
- 08/02 – Motorola's Motoluxe to Hit UK End of February
- 08/02 – TomTom, UK Insurance Company Team Up for Cheaper Policies
- 08/02 – Microsoft and UK Protection Firm Create Child-safe Browser
LOL i like how the author is slagging it of saying how he thought it fell short compaired to the previous ones etc and then gives it 8 out of 10. Did he give the previous games 10 out of 10 then? and if its "one step foward two steps back", Why is it 8 out of 10 and not 5 or 6?. Hypocritical......
Hi all fragers out there!!
Rubbish review... Its like the worst, extended I have read so far about UT3. I read many informed posts on various gaming forums about the UT3 demo. Especially the weakness of the graphics engine. With screen shots to back up their arguments (dumb stuff like shadows casting shadows I think). Like Mr Gansta said this game sounds like a 5/10. Is the author being sponsored by Epic or perhaps he just has his hand up his ass!!
Have you ever played UT2004 Mr Lord? Spider mines are available in it and have been since the original demo - THEY ARE NOT NEW!!
I really enjoyed UT2004 and got the demo first which I enjoyed playing first. The UT3 demo wouldn't even install on either of my rigs. I have an ol' P4+7800GS 512Mb rig running Windows XP Pro 32bit and a dual Opteron+X1950 Pro 512Mb running Windows XP Pro 64bit (so decent and not really that exotic). Had no problem with other demos recently like Crysis (way cool graphics there)!!
Looks like Epic have really gone down hill pandering to the knob twiddling console crowd...
Ah well just have to stick with BF2 and BF2142 for some decent on-line gaming experience!!
Bob Wya
two things.
first a correction for your review. There is no 360 release yet or even announced. The Pc version was release first buy it's self the Ps3 version delayed and 360 ver isn't slated until sometime next year as far as we know. So really there was no simultaneous release.
#2 @ bob wya
The demo/Beta was downgraded graphically. Mark Reign said it was so more people would download it. I would hold judgement on the visuals till you see the real game. other than that no complaints. I feel ya on the missing game types but hey thats what mods are for. I couldn't install the demo on my pc either I run Win XP pro x64 with EVGA gforce 7800gt. Still buying the game.
This is the first review I have read that has accurately nailed down all the flaws of UT3. While the game is very enjoyable, I believe that Epic has made major errors in 'consolizing' it, which as stated in the review, is a result of splitting this iteration over multiple formats. I am holding out hope for patches to fix the varaious issues such as the server browser, nearly-silent and overpowered mantas, and the nerfing of various weapons (the flak secondary has to be the most blatant example of this as it is definitely configured to save PS3 joypadders the hassle of aiming upwards with their analogue stick). The annoying announcer and simplification of the gametypes is also quite blatant.
Time will tell if these issues are fixed. In a way, Epic has gone for the big bucks (look at unit cost and lack of piracy as well as market size for the consoles) and probably made an internal decision to rely on the PC modding community to fix their broken gametypes. Personally I do not see this franchise being played with much skill on a console. As a long term UT2004 player, I can appreciate the time it takes to become a very good player in ONS or DM gametypes. UT3 seems dumbed down slightly in this respect. But that is just my opinion. Of course, if enough people get sick of it, they will simply return to UT2004.
A bit harsh but overall a fair judgement on the game. Less of the same but prettier. There were spider mines in 2004.
I must say that I mistrust ANYONE who says the are fans of both UT99 AND UT200X. In my opion thats two totally different games. I'm a long time UT99-player (especially sniper) and I was fooled by the hype and bought both UT2003 and UT2004. I found both totally..disgusting, because of the moon-gravity, the strange physics, the kids crayon-colours of the maps.
Finally with UT3 they have restored some of the magical gameplay of the original.
ty