VIA Launching tiny QuadCore CPU @ 1.2GHz
VIA new quad-core QuadCore processor will have a TDP of only 27.5 watts.
Thursday VIA Technologies revealed the new VIA QuadCore processor, a power efficient, quad-core x86 CPU best suited for desktops, notebooks, small form factor PCs, AIOs, and even mini-servers. The chip features a thermal design power (TDP) of only 27.5 watts, and will initially ship clocked at 1.2+ GHz later this year.
"As a result of the rapid proliferation of high definition multimedia content and increasingly demanding multi-threaded applications, a four core processor is the new baseline for today’s mainstream PC user," said Epan Wu, Head of Processor Platforms, VIA Technologies, Inc. "The VIA QuadCore processor meets that need with the industry’s most power efficient architecture."
Manufactured using 40-nm processing, the VIA QuadCore consists of four "Isaiah" cores mounted on two dies. The chip is natively 64-bit compatible and comes packed with additional performance enhancers like Adaptive Overclocking, 4 MB of L2 cache, and a 1333 MHz V4 Bus. And as previously mentioned, the CPU has an extremely low TDP of only 27.5 watts.
"Yhe VIA QuadCore processor delivers awesome multi-threaded performance across the board for multi-tasking, multimedia playback, productivity and internet browsing in a low power envelope," VIA said Thursday. "The distributed performance of the VIA QuadCore also makes it ideal for making the most of multi-display environments."
Other notable features include a VIA NanoBGA2 package of 21-mm x 21-mm with a die size of 11-mm x 6-mm, VIA VT virtualization, VIA PadLock with the Advanced Cryptography Engine, and full pin-to-pin compatibility with VIA Eden, VIA C7 and VIA Nano E-Series, and VIA Eden X2 processors.
Shipments of the VIA QuadCore processor will begin in Q3 2011. VIA also plans to showcase the new processor in a few weeks at Computex (Taipei International Convention Center, Room 201D) from May 31st to June 4th.
- Police Ordered to Reveal Location of Secret Cams
- Scottish Grandma Convicted of File-sharing
- Chiltern Railways Launches Paperless Ticket App
- Lenovo Shows Off Its Razor-thin Thinkpad X1
- Google Shows Off Two New Chrome OS Notebooks
- Samsung Working on Solar-Powered Netbook?
- Can The Murderbox Play Crysis? It Should for $20K
- Moto Spending £10m on Atrix, Xoom Marketing
- Ofcom Tackles Surprsing 'Shock Phone Bills'
- Intel Develops 22 nm Atom Silvermont CPU
- UK Digital Music Industry Passes £1bn in Sales
- T-Mobile UK Apolgises for Overcharging Thousands
- HTC Flyer Gets Official: Available Today in the UK
- F.E.A.R. 3's ''F**king Run!'' Multiplayer Mode
- Scientists Create a ''Schizophrenic'' Computer
- How to Pick the Parts in Tom's System Builder App
- Google Says Windows is Torturing Users
- Vodafone Reveals Own-brand £80 Smartphone







Boring!
Why dont they crank it up to 3GHz and kick some ass? That would only be like what? 65W? Which will the most power efficent mainstream quadcore. Its architecture is actually fairly nice, being able to decode full HD 1080p on its Nano 1.3Ghz Single core, at 3Ghz quad core of this should do some serious damage. Why are we not seeing this on the market? Its sad seeing how Intel is dominating the netbook sector alone.
But to be fair, the design above is pointless, 27W? Why? We might aswell go for a ULV Dual Core from Intel which probably performs better and has better support with the chipset. The Atom only takes 8W on Dual Core + HT (4 Threads) @ 1.5Ghz, why would we choose something like this that runs hotter and uses more power. Via rethink your stratergies!
The TDP is too high for ultraportable, the performance too low for a mainstream desktop.
Okay, there is a tiny market spot between Brazos and Bobcat, where a cheaper-than-Sandy Bridge CPU is still missing. However, that's too small a market to survive on imo.
Worse still, they don't have any sexy hardware partners in their sleeves it seems...
The TDP is too high for ultraportable, the performance too low for a mainstream desktop.Okay, there is a tiny market spot between Brazos and Bobcat, where a cheaper-than-Sandy Bridge CPU is still missing. However, that's too small a market to survive on imo.Worse still, they don't have any sexy hardware partners in their sleeves it seems...
+1 If they're aiming for ULV/CULV they need to do better than that.