Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

AMD Pitcairn With 768 Shaders: What is This Mystery Chip?

By - Source: Tom's Hardware DE | B 1 comment

Tom's Hardware Germany got its hands on a prototype of a AFOX HD 7850, the world's first single-slot board with this chip, which ended up being more than meets the eye. Is it an unannounced GPU, or something that was never meant to ever leave the lab?

Our colleagues at one of our European labs were handed an early version of an AMD Pitcairn-based Radeon HD 7850. What made this AFOX unit special from the currently existing Radeon HD 7850 reference design that we've already peeled apart is that is it a single-slot solution as opposed to one that takes up two of your expansion spaces. Here is what comes up with plugging it into GPU-Z:

A look at the device ID, the clock speeds and memory reveal nothing out of the ordinary. What caught our attention, however, was the number of available shader units. While the Radeon HD 7850 we were expecting comes with 1024 shaders, but our sample had only 768 shaders.

This compelled us to dig deeper, so we removed the cooler and the abundant amounts of thermal paste. The board itself was a product from AOLIDA Jiutan Xinhua Town (Guangdong).

Please keep in mind that this is just an engineering sample, and is not a fair representation of any final shipping product. Any product packing a Radeon HD 7850 GPU will be equipped with 1024 shaders. We're treating this product in the Tom's Hardware labs as something of a mystery.

We tried looking into the BIOS to see if it would shed some light on the shader number difference, but none of our traditional BIOS tools revealed any information. The card identified itself in Catalyst software as a Radeon HD 7850, but it was incompatible with the Overdrive overclocking functions.

BIOS limitation, laser-cut or faulty chip?

With a card that identifies itself (somewhat) as a Radeon HD 7850, we were expecting a chip stamped with 1151, but our GPU scrubbing revealed a 1152 ENG, further confusing the matter. If it is indeed a different chip, then perhaps it isn't a case of cut or disabled shaders. In fact, even after uploading reference card BIOS of each of 7870 and 7850, the card was both stable and exhibited no change in performance, leading us to assume that only 768 shaders active.

We've brought this issue to AMD only to be referred back to the board partners. AFOX told use that AMD has been delivering chips in March 2012 with 768 shaders for the layout design. Still, we're not sure how this chip ended up on the board designated for the HD 7850.

One theory is that AMD is sending out partially defective chips for PCB developers to experiment with instead of throwing them away, but that may go against the logic of having engineers trying to validate on an 'incomplete' GPU. Maybe - just maybe - it's an unannounced Radeon HD 7830 that slipped through the cracks and into our labs.

Our team in Germany will be putting this card through its paces. Stay tuned for that coming next week!

Update 05/03/2012

AMD Shanghai became aware of our discovery of a Pitcairn chip with 768 shaders and made it clear that it did not want news spreading of a Radeon HD 7850 with only 768 shaders. To be clear, AFOX was just as surprised as everyone else to learn about this mystery chip. This PCB with this chip was produced at the beginning of the Radeon HD 7800-series' production. It's plausible that these 768 shader chips were indeed for validation due to supply considerations. Given the stir that this discovery has created, it's safe to assume that this chip wasn't intended to leave the engineering labs.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    contrasia , 4 May 2012 17:05
    Always interesting when you get a bit of hardware that no-one on the outside is suppose to have. I note that a trend for Nvidia cards is that they start off really powerful, but the power and capabilities are reduced for the same cards with each new revision (Making them cheaper), so the first is always the one with the beefiest specs. Could it not be an early version of a later revision for the 7850? If it was the 1152 ENG would then make more sense.