Test Settings
| Component | Base Settings |
|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Phenom X4 9950 2.60 GHz, HT-2000, 4MB Cache |
| CPU Cooler | Zalman CNPS9700 |
| RAM | Crucial Ballistix BL25664AA80A Set to DDR2-1066, CL 5-5-5-15, 2.20V |
| Graphics | Gigabyte GV-R487-512H-B HD 4870 GPU (750 MHz), GDDR5-3600 |
| Hard Drive | Western Digital WD5000AAKS, 500 GB 7,200 RPM, SATA 3 Gb/s, 16 MB cache |
| Sound | Integrated HD Audio |
| Network | Integrated Gigabit Networking |
| Power | Coolermaster RS850-EMBA (850W, ATX12V v2.2) |
| Software and Drivers | |
| Operating System | Windows Vista Ultimate SP1 |
| Graphics Driver | ATI Catalyst 8.9 |
| Onboard Device Drivers | Motherboard Driver DVD |
To best determine the overclocking capabilities of these high-end AMD 790FX + SB750 chipset motherboards, we brought back MSI’s K9N2 Diamond, which is based on the highly competitive nForce 780a SLI chipset from Nvidia.
AMD sent its fastest Phenom X4 processor, the 2.60 GHz model 9950 BE, for us to use in our motherboard overclocking and performance evaluation.
Overclocking doesn’t have much value if the rest of the system can’t perform, so we also ran our standard set of performance benchmarks.
| Crysis | Version: 1.2.1 Test 1: 1024x768, Low Details, No AA Test 2: 1920x1200, Very High Details, 8x AA Demo: CPU-Benchmark + Tom’s Hardware Tool |
| Supreme Commander Forged Alliance | Version: 1.5.3599 Test 1: 1024x768, Low Details, No AA Test 2: 1920x1200, Very High Details, 8x AA Demo: WallaceTX_006_006 Benchmark: Fraps 2.9.4 - Build 7037 |
| Unreal Tournament 3 | Version: 1.2 Sound and DirectX10 Texture Details: 1 Level Details: 1 Demo: vCTF-Reflection_bot Time: 12/60 |
| World in Conflict | Version: 1.0.0.9 Test 1: Very Low details (No AA, No AF) Test 2: Very High details (4x AA, 4x AF) Demo: Game-Benchmark |
| iTunes | Version: 7.7.0.43 Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 min Default format AAC |
| Lame MP3 | Version: 3.98 Beta 3 (05-22-2007) Audio CD Terminator II SE, 53 min wave to MP3 160kb/s |
| TMPEG 4.5 | Version: 4.5.1.254 Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (5 Minutes) Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9 |
| DivX 6.8.3 | Encoding mode: Insane Quality Enhanced multithreading Enabled using SSE4 Quarter-pixel search |
| XviD 1.1.3 | Display encoding status = off |
| Nero 8 Recode | Version: 3.1.4.0 - Recode an Entire DVD to DVD - convert DVD-9 to DVD5 - High quality mode (slow recording) - disable video preview |
| Mainconcept Reference 1.5.1 Reference H.264 Plugin Pro 1.5.1 | MPEG2 to MPEG2 (H.264) MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec 28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG2) Audio: MPEG2 (44.1 kHz, 2 Channel, 16 Bit, 224 kbps) Mode: PAL (25 FPS) Profile: Tom’s Hardware Settings for Qct-Core |
| Pinnacle Studio 12 | Version: 12.0.0.6163 Encoding and Transition Rendering Private MPEG2-Cam-Movie Video: 720 x 576 Pixel, PAL, 25 FPS, 6000 Kb/s Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 Kb/s 16 Bit, Stereo 44.1 KHz File Type: MPEG-2 (DVD Compatible) |
| Autodesk 3D Studio Max 9 | Version: 9.0 Rendering Dragon Image at 1920x1080 (HDTV) |
| Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional | Version: 9.0.0 (Extended) Default Settings: Standard Encrypt all documents (128 bit RC4) |
| Adobe Photoshop CS 3 | Version: 10.0x20070321 Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo Benchmark: Tomshardware-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 Filters: Crosshatch, Glass, Sumi-e, Accented Edges, Angled Strokes, Sprayed Strokes |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus 8 | Version: 8.0.134 Virus base: 270.4.5/1533 Benchmark: Scan 334 MB Folder of ZIP/RAR compressed files |
| Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10 | Version: 10.008 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8-bits (50 Frames) |
| Deep Fritz 11 | Version: 11 Fritz Chess Benchmark Version 4.2 |
| Winrar 3.80 | Version 3.70 BETA 8 WinZIP Commandline Version 2.3 Compression = Best Dictionary = 4096 KB Benchmark: THG-Workload (334 MB) |
| Winzip 11 | Version 11.2 Compression = Best Benchmark: THG-Workload (139 MB) |
| 3DMark Vantage | Version: 1.02 GPU and CPU scores |
| PCMark Vantage | Version: 1.00 System, Memory, Hard Disk Drive benchmarks Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646 |
| SiSoftware Sandra XII SP2 | Version 2008.5.14.24 CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / MultiMedia Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
6
Comments
Sponsored
Latest Motherboards News
Latest Motherboards reviews
- 12/01 – Seven $260-$320 X79 Express Motherboards, Reviewed
- 07/12 – Ultimate X79? Five £230+ LGA 2011 Motherboards, Reviewed
- 07/11 – Five £130 To £195 990FX-Based Socket AM3+...
- 13/10 – Man Vs. Machine: Four Automatic Overclocking Techs, Compared
- 19/09 – Round-Up: Four Z68 Motherboards From £190 To £260


The clock rates in this article are very very low, even SB600 motherboards where beating some of the overclocks here.
AMD chips shine after 3.3mhz, and you guys didnt even push them that far.
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=442306
Example of a overclocked 9950, not the 3.1ghz this article implies is it.
Goodbye.

Let me start with the unpleasant question that must be asked: did Toms even TRY to OC or did they just make it all up? Given the claims of hitting 3.7GHz on air with ACC tweakery and proven posted results well over 3.5GHz I'm starting to think Toms just made all the results up.
One massively biased article may not be so dodgy on its own but all the slight comments and endless derision and misstatements here and there AND all of heavily biased articles over the last 18 months makes it clear as to who "funds" Tom's Group nowadays; I finally feel they've finally gone too far.
I'm not a big AMD fanboi - its an Intel CPU powering my rig - but all this bias ultimately serves one purpose - an Intel monopoly - which WILL hurt ALL enthusiasts and the PC market in general regardless of the current excellence of their products; they won't be so good if Intel has no competition. Its the unaccountable, slightly ridiculous and either childish or openly corrupt behavior of Toms thats riled me and - far more importantly - killed the trust I had in them. In which case the entire site is as impartial as an Intel press release.
Sorry, but you suck Tomshardware.
EU INVESTIGATORS have decided that Intel has been a very naughty chip maker and will hand it a severe spanking when the verdict is delivered in late summer, according to the FT Deutschland.
Citing sources in Brussels, the paper says Intel will be forced to stop offering customers rebates in return for exclusivity. The firm will also have to stop subsidising retailers' advertising, which could mean the end of its boing bingly-bing-bong annoyance at the end of such ads.
The punishment Intel is in line to receive will be one the most severe in the EU's history, the paper said.
According to the report, EU commissioner Neelie Kroes has already made her mind up, and the lady is not for turning.
After months of investigations into Intel's business practices, Eurocrats have enough evidence to throw the book at Intel, it appears. They will now spend the summer adding weight to that book.
A shocked Intel in the US promised us a comment once its senior spinners awake. µ
How much they pay you people, or how many freebies did you collect.
I do belive they pointed out at the begining the dissapointment in the high end leverage of these products, but outlined that they wanted to fous on value.
I used to bleed AMD green shaded blood, but all this fuss over Toms Hardware not OCing to 3.5 or 3.7GHz is a tad over the top.
I always read these AMD articles hoping somehow AMD may pull some magic rabbit from their hat, but until we see a genuinely re-worked core its not going to happen.
An extra integer pipeline to leverage the increased ILP achievable in x86-64, combined with some SMT implementation would be nice. They're doing a lot of good talk with future integration of GPU's and CPU's but without a strong CPU offering I only see their market share dwindling.
At the end of the day a Q6600 pushes further at a lower cost price and better end performance, so why bother with an overpriced Phenom 9950? A Core 2 Quad @ 3.6GHz & an Intel E4600 @ 3.9GHz show where my money is at for the time being...