Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: OSX86, Image, ToH, Mac, Hackintosh
Categories: Hardware
When Worlds Collide

There are so many great clichés. Take these two for example – “Apple users belong to an elitist group that cares more about looks than functionality” and “Macs are more expensive than an X86 Windows PC or offer less for the same price”. Times change, though, and now Apple’s computers are also based on the x86 micro-processor architecture and use Intel hardware across the board. Users are even given the option of installing Windows alongside Mac OS X using the integrated Bootcamp utility – a capability that any conventional x86 PC lacks. Seen from this perspective, you basically get two PCs in one. Even cheaper than a dual-boot Apple PC is building your own Mac using off-the-shelf components. Naturally, the installation is a little trickier than on a real Mac and takes more time as well. Also, there is no guarantee that all features will work on the DIY Mac, as we point out further on in this article.
Hackers have been working on making the DIY Mac a reality since the first release of OS X for Intel hardware. The goal – to create an affordable platform that is easy to set up and install and offers good performance. The final result should be a Mac (PC-system) that dual boots Mac OS X and Windows XP/Vista; a platform, in other words, that allows users to get their toes wet in the Mac world while giving them the safety net of a Windows installation on the same machine.
The problem is that Apple does not offer an official version of Mac OS X for normal PCs (yet), so that resourceful hackers have stepped up and created their own modified versions, which are constantly being updated and refined. The growing enthusiasm for Apple’s operating system is not just apparent on message boards and forums, either – even dyed-in-the-wool Microsoft fans find themselves flirting with the mature, user friendly and stable Mac OS. Software is available for both the Power PC and Intel hardware, and conversely, even old PPC applications will run on Intel systems thanks to the integrated real-time emulator dubbed Rosetta.
This article is meant as a kind of inspiration, if you will – a purely experimental attempt to build a system than runs Mac OS X from off-the-shelf components. The components themselves are also quite inexpensive, which fits well with the DIY theme. In the end, we were able to create a Mac with 2D graphics suitable for office tasks as well as home usage, thanks to the help of our resourceful friend. Gamers have the option of installing a more powerful 3D card and booting into Windows for more 3D power. The less charitable members of the hacker community would probably put it this way – dual boot between Mac OS and the toy OS.
Apple sells this version of its operating system (Mac OS X 10.5 – Leopard) sells for around €129/£85 in its online store. We met with a well-known hacker from the OSX86 scene who showed us a number of tricks to smooth the installation process. We started off with an official and legally obtained version of the current Mac OS X, which our helpful friend proceeded to install on a conventional PC with the help of a few tools. After all, all other components being identical, the only major difference between a standard PC and a Mac is the Mac’s special BIOS (EFI – Extensible Firmware Interface). On its Intel Macs, Apple includes its own boot loader as well as the drivers for the HFS+ file system right into the EFI-BIOS, suppressing all command lines and consoles.
Currently, a number of different DVD images are circulating on the web, created by hackers such as JaS, Uphuck or ToH. Their success point to an increasing interest in a modified version of OS X, jokingly also referred to as Hackintosh, whose kernel and bootloader allow it to run on a conventional PC.
If you believe the talk in insider forums, the market has been ready for Apple to open its OS to a wider audience for quite some time now. That’s not much of a surprise. After all, we’re talking about a very mature and stable OS here. Apple grabbed the spotlight with two nigh-on revolutionary steps, namely the transition of its entire product line to Intel hardware and the support for dual-booting into Windows using the Bootcamp utility. This was in 2005, and still the community’s enthusiasm shows no sign of ebbing any time soon.
In the end, it’s not the performance of the hardware we use here that makes this project so fascinating to us. Instead, it is their low price, which in turn allows us to build a very affordable Mac system – all on our own. If you find this project as interesting as we do and are doing some Christmas PC shopping, consider choosing components that will work well both in Windows and Mac OS X.
- Next page Choosing the right Hardware: Barebone...
Best offers
- hfs windows xp
- dual boot bios
- change computer name command line
- pc hardware
- create user command line
- change user command line
- graphical boot loader
- windows who is using a file
- the most expensive pc
- build low power pc
- hardware difference between mac and pc
- difference between xp and vista
- how to open a pc shop
- apple time machine windows
- how to install windows xp on a computer with no operating system





Let the bitching of the Mac haters commence!
Let the bitching of the Mac lovers commence!
Actually I'm a BSD lover (Who still likes XP for gaming no matter what Apple and EA may try). The only truly good part of Apple that's in OSX is the Finder (and the fact that you can get the best commercial media apps for what is essentially a BSD). Explorer was one thing I truly hated about Windows, even more so since I got used to the Finder. Where's the no to all option? Why can't folders open for me to drag files into? Why can't I script it and add my own toolbar buttons? It does merge copied/moved folders properly though (less the 'no to all'), where OSX just overwrites the entire branch, although that's because of *nix file handling not Mac.
All the *nix developers who came up with OSX's foundation deserve far more credit for OSX than Apple, as pretty much all the good points about the OS come from it's *nix roots. That was one of the earlier revolutionary steps Apple took, dropping that OS9 rubbish and getting someone else's system to base OSX on.
I really wish Apple had left /etc and the .conf configuration system alone, instead of going with netinfo. That's one place that shouldn't be proprietary, as it makes scripting a pain. Having X11 and darwinports is handy if you really want to dump huge chunks of Apple.
Apple's computers really are overpriced, unless you're looking at them in terms of design and decoration. People spend stupid money on other things just because they look better too. I got an MBP and the design is partly worth it (I wanted a laptop that looked good, so I'd look after it). The clean lines don't catch on stuff, and nothing has broken off. But the maglock connector is a nuisance and useless when there's a network cable plugged into the thing. I won't be buying another Mac for any time soon though. Not everyone can be a trendy design yuppie with lots of money to spend on their image, and I hate the image Apple is trying to sell.
Jobs reminds me a little of Dr. Breen from HL2, a man I thoroughly wanted to punch in the face. At least Bill Gates is more like a geek/real computer (ab)user, and not some pretentious marketing nob.
OSX can WRITE to as well as read from NTFS file systems with free software.