Conclusion
On the bottom line, the performance of this GeForce 9600 GT came as a pleasant surprise. Despite the stream processors being limited to only 64 on this chip, its 38% lower processing power, and 33% fewer transistors, gaming performance was only 12% below the 8800 GT on average. And it was even between 1% (without antialiasing) and 45% (with) better than the 8800 GT 256 MB (which is greatly hampered by its 256 MB of memory) – which means that the latter card is no longer even worth considering! Meaning that it was an extremely good choice to put 512 MB of memory on the 9600 GT, even if that doesn’t account for everything, since the 8800 GT has the same amount of memory.
The upshot is that the 9600 GT puts nVidia in a much more favorable position to compete with AMD. First, the HD 3850 is beaten hands down performance-wise, since even compared to its 512-MB version (which can be found on sale at 165-170 €, the expected MSRP for the 9600 GT), performance was approximately 15% better. Only the 256-MB version still has no competition, given its 140 € price point.
As for the HD 3870, currently available starting at 180 €, we can only recommend it to people who don’t use antialiasing – with that restriction, its performance remains better than the 9600 GT’s (by 5%). Once antialiasing is enabled, the performance spread is the same, but this time in favor of the 9600 GT, due to AMD’s uncorrected ROPs. But in any event we can only congratulate nVidia on the quality of the 9600 GT’s performance, especially considering that it has close to 2.5 times less raw power than the HD 3870! So the GeForce 9600 GT currently has more arguments in its favor than the HD 3870. But, keeping in mind the aggressive pricing policy AMD is capable of wielding, that situation could evolve down the road.
As proof of that last statement, AMD called us less than 24 hours before the end of this test to announce a sudden and significant drop in the price of its Radeon HD 3000 series. In the US, the MSRP of the HD 3870 will go from $245 to $189 and the HD 3850 512 MB’s from $199 to $169! That will again put AMD on top where price is concerned compared to nVidia’s offering. But now we have to see how nVidia will react to the news… It’s an unending war and it’s hard to stay on top of. But in this particular battle there’s no doubt that the consumer will be the winner!
- Pros
- Cons
- Performance/price ratio
- The best card in its price range for performance with antialiasing enabled >
- Reduced power consumption and noise
- Performance below that of the HD 3870 without filters
- Not really any more a "GeForce 9" card than the 8800 GTs
Nice analysis as always but does anyone every proof read this stuff. On
Page 17 it seems clear that the TH UK guys were sent it by the American site and they forgot to check all the links, hence the [link to your 8800GT 256MB article here] comment. Also a mix up on the first page saying the 8800GTX had 786 not 768 ram.
It seems to get worse and worse!
Seems like a very good card. Fewer shading units, but faster memory than the 8800 GT. That 256-bit memory interface really shines, although I would not personally be willing to use any 9600 GT with less than 512MB, certainly not if they switched from GDDR3 to something inferior. I would buy this card and at this price I think it fills the mid-range gap very nicely. Thanks Tom.
Don't forget that the driver it's a new one...
I had msi 8600gt oc and i see big diferrent between 163.75 and 169.25 forceware driver so maybe the 9600gt come closer to 8800gt and with little overclocking maybe it can pass it!!
Ok so what happened to the next Generation should be faster and more powerful than the previous... Good rule I thought...
This is not good news for us recent EVGA buyers waiting for the new 8800 GTX/Ultra GPU killer...
Bob
Bob, it's classed as a mid-range card, but is able to compete with 8xxx series high-end cards. With more shader units it would be faster. Sure you can make it faster, but the cost soon jumps. Considering the kind of card it can out-class I think it's a very good card for the money.
Overclock the shaders. That should bring the performance up somewhat.
Still, why didn't they badge it as the 8650 or something? This generation-jumping that ATi started with the 3850/3870 gets incredibly confusing after a while. I'd hate to know how the poor saps in retail are coping with it, particularly with the average client/gamer IQ.
Yeh,
If they had just started the 9xxx series with the G92 8800GT and 8800GTS then everyones lives would be simplier!!
Bob