Nvidia CEO Wants Further Action Against Intel
Nvidia's CEO says that additional measures need to be taken against Intel.
Even though Intel must now shell out a whopping $1.25 billion USD to rival AMD, Nvidia CEO Jen-Hsun Huang says that there needs to be further action taken against Intel. It's not the first time Nvidia has spoken out against the CPU giant: its complained about Intel's business practices for years, especially in the mobile sector.
As it stands, Intel currently owns 53-percent of the GPU market share, followed by a distant 24-percent with Nvidia. In the notebook integrated market, Intel commands a hammering 80-percent of the market. Nvidia claims that the latter number stems from Intel's "bundling" tactics, and that the company is impeding competition on two chipset fronts.
"Intel's tactics with Ion have been the most aggressive we've seen from a competitor. They have offered the Atom [a total of three chips] for $25, but when the one-chip Atom is used with Ion, it sells for $45," Nvidia CEO Jen Hsun Huang said in a statement provided to CNET. "A customer can't even choose to resell the chipset and use Ion instead. What's the point of Nvidia getting an Intel bus license if it's impossible to overcome Intel's pricing bundles?" he asked, referring the licensing fee that Nvidia pays Intel.
Huang told CNET that Nvidia will certainly keep growing as a company, but further action needs to be taken to protect the valued customer. Intel, according to CNET, disputes Nvidia's claims, saying that its a trick of numbers, a mix of apples and oranges. "We have scrubbed and continue to scrub our pricing practices as it relates to chipsets and processors," a spokesperson for Intel said. "It's all above cost. And that meets the legal standard worldwide."
Follow me on twitter to get inside scoops and updates even faster!
- Report: Asus Contemplating Toshiba Acquisition
- Valve Makes TF2, L4D2 Holiday Greeting Cards
- Dell Gets Official with Android-powered Phone
- Apple Scores Big in Case Against Psystar
- AMD-powered Jaguar is 'Fastest Supercomputer'
- Microsoft Now Recruiting for Windows 8
- Sneak Peek: Tom's Holiday Photo Shoot
- Office 2010 Beta Leaks Onto Torrent Sites
- Dell Launches Tiny, Little Inspiron Zino HD
- Monday Deals: Win 7 OEM, SSD, Gaming Mouse
- Windows 7 Desktops Will Host 3rd-Party Ads
- Google Makes Translate Better With New Features
- Apple to Offer 25% Off Macs on Black Friday
- CNN Titles Apple Tablet as 'The Everything Killer'
- Microsoft Co-founder Diagnosed With Cancer
- Hackers Makes Modern Warfare 2 Ded. Server?
- World of Warcraft Mr. T Gives Mohawk Grenades
- Pirate Bay Torrent Tracker Shuts Down Forever






I agree with Nvidia and Intel's GPU's should be stripped from the damn personal market and only be sold in business PC's
Blah, Blah, Blah - this is just another case of smaller companies trying to get large payments from bigger ones just like they did with Microsoft.
Valued customers, that guy really is losing the plot.
intel has been in the spotlight a few times because their new cpu's dont deliver the expected performance increases in a real world situation, remember facebook complaining about their 'pointless' server upgrade?
Im with Nvidia, you cant enter the market as a CUP provider, charge GUP manufacturers for licensing rights, then under-cut them on price. its unethical. hence the payout. Monopolies can always