Benchmark Settings
| 3D-Games | |
| Crysis | Version: 1.1 |
| Video Modes: 800x600 (low), 1920x1200 (high) | |
| Video Quality: Low Details (low), Very High Details (high) | |
| Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high) | |
| Benchmark: Benchmark_CPU.bat | |
| Supreme Commander | Version: 3.220 |
| Video Modes: 1024x768 (low), 1920x1200 (high) | |
| Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high) | |
| Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high) | |
| Graphics: Medium | |
| Test Path: Options/Performance/Test Settings | |
| Unreal Tournament 3 | Version: 1.2 (Dual-Core Patch) |
| Video Modes: 640x480 (low), 1920x1200 (high) | |
| Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high) | |
| Post Processing: Default (low), Intense (high) | |
| Benchmark: 16-bot botmatch (war-marketdistrict) | |
| Applications | |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus | Version: 7.5.467 |
| Virus Base: 269.6.1/776 | |
| Benchmark: Scanning 3.82GB Application Folder | |
| Maxon Cinema 4D | Version: 10.008 |
| Resolution: 1280x1024 | |
| Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8 bits (50 Frames) | |
| Adobe Photoshop CS3 | Version: 10.0x20070321 |
| Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo | |
| Benchmark: Tom’s Guide-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 | |
| Rarlab Winrar | Version 3.70 BETA 8 |
| Compression = Best | |
| Dictionary = 4096 kB | |
| Uncompressed Folder Size: 642 MB | |
| Video | |
| TMPEGEnc 4.0 Xpress | Version: 4.2.10.211 |
| Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (2 Minutes) | |
| Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9 | |
| Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English | |
| Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160 kb/s) | |
| DivX 6.6 | Version: 6.6.1 |
| Profile: Home Theater Profile (720x576) | |
| 1-pass, 780 kb/s | |
| Encoding mode: Insane Quality | |
| Enhanced multithreading | |
| XviD 1.1.2 | Version: 1.1.2 |
| Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality) | |
| Clone DVD 2 | Version: 2.908 |
| DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version) | |
| Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7 | |
| Audio: English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTS | |
| Subtitles: None | |
| Synthetics | |
| SiSoftware Sandra XII | Version 2008.4.14.20 |
| Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark | |
| Hard Drive Performance | |
| Low Level Performance | h2benchw 3.6 (by c’t Magazine) |
| I/O Performance | IOMeter 2003.05.10 |
| Fileserver Benchmark | |
| Webserver Benchmark | |
| Database Benchmark | |
| Workstation Benchmark | |
| Audio | |
| Rightmark Audio Analyzer | Version: 6.0.6 |
| Stream Quality: 16 bits, 44.1 kHz |
4
Comments
Sponsored
Latest Motherboards News
- 22/05 – Does Your AMD FX Platform BSOD with Steam? Read This.
- 04/05 – 54 Million Enthusiast and Performance PC Gamers Globally
- 01/05 – Intel's Next Unit of Computing Rivals Raspberry Pi in Size
- 10/04 – Intel P67 Express Chipset Begins Product Discontinuance Cycle
- 26/03 – Tom's Hardware Benchmark Charts and Database Updated
Latest Motherboards reviews
- 30/04 – Six Sub-£160 Z77 Motherboards, Benchmarked And Reviewed
- 23/04 – Video Teaser: Intel's DZ77GA-70K Motherboard
- 17/04 – Overclocking: Asus Rampage IV Extreme Versus EVGA X79 FTW
- 08/04 – Intel’s Z77 Express And Lucidlogix MVP: New Features...
- 27/02 – Six £165-£215 LGA 2011 Motherboards, Reviewed
I must say the mystery motherboard sounds alot like the foxconn blackops which has already been reviewed by custom pc which is in the shops so i would say if it is that then you should be safe to give the name, but I may be completely wrong
ALERT: The battleship is sinking. Foxconn take off their d*e*u*h*n*u*h* ... oops... site off for more than a week so something was to be awaited. Really bad thing at all 'cause evgas FTW will end in WTF again with nice corruption issues. But at least nehalem is in sight, so far we've to submerge and play submarine, sorry shamino can't refrain. ^^
#1. The Foxconn BlackOPs is an X48 board.. not a 790i... the Dreadnaught is the 790i Quantum Force board.
#2. Foxconn have announced they're dropping their 790i boards due to quality control issues in the Nvidia chipset...
[quote]Asus adds power and reset buttons to the lower edge of its Striker II Extreme, along with a switch that enables or disables a rear panel CLR_CMOS button. The firm continues to ignore the fact that front-panel switch connectors have been standardized for several years, and instead uses its own layout./[quote]
uhm lets see maybe they've put those switches on the motherboard because there are people that want to run their system on a testbench before putting it in a case...
so then those switches are pretty convenient aren't they? no more shorting pins with a screwdriver...