Microsoft Promises "Fair and Reasonable" Patent Licensing
In a post its official blog, Microsoft confirmed on Tuesday an official change to its policy on licensing of industry standard patents
"The international standards system works well," the statement says, "because firms that contribute to standards promise to make their essential patents available to others on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms." The statement also seems to call Apple to account, noting that "[c]onsumers and the entire industry will suffer if, in disregard of this promise, firms seek to block others from shipping products on the basis of such standard essential patents."
As part of the new policy, Microsoft has vowed to "always adhere" to promises made to standards organizations. The Redmond, WA-based company has vowed not to sue or seek injunctions against companies using "those essential patents," and to make licenses available without quid pro quo sharing of patents from a licensing company, except when those patents are "essential to the same industry standard".
While this move could be interpreted as intended to avoid worldwide courtroom fights like the ongoing conflict between Apple and Samsung, it is also intended to force the hand of its competitors. Google announced on the same day its own policy regarding the licensing of industry standard patents, one directly at odds with Microsoft's. Google intends to retain the option to seek an injunction should patent negotiations fail. As Microsoft's new policy also states they will not license patents to companies whose policies are not in lockstep with their own, it would seem the disagreement over Google's supposed cribbing of elements from Windows in the creation of Android will continue apace.
For further reading, Dave Heiner, the head of Microsoft's Corporate Standards Group & Antitrust Group, elaborated the new policy in a lengthy post to Technet. The company has recently-inked patent sharing deals with Quanta, Samsung, Acer, and ViewSonic.
- Google Could be Planning a Retail Store in Dublin
- AMD Launches FirePro V3900 Professional GPU
- AMD Adds FM1 CPUs Athlon II X4 638 and Athlon II X4 641
- Laser Heat Used to Make HDD Write Transfers Faster
- Loads of Skyrim Mods Already on Steam Workshop
- Rambus Convinces Nvidia to Sign License Agreement
- Chrome 17 With Web Page Prerendering Now for Download
- Anonymous Hacks Syrian President; His Password Was 12345
- Windows 8 Consumer Preview on Feb 29, Claims Invitation
- Vodafone Details Pricing for PS Vita 3G
- Updated: Raspberry Pi Commercial Version in 3Q12
- Diablo 3 Won't Be Anywhere in Sight Until at Least Q2 2012
- Leaked Slide Shows Intel Haswell Set for March-June 2013
- CPU Performance Boosted 20% When CPU, GPU Collaborate
- Microsoft Details Windows on ARM, Desktop Apps Support
- Hacker Says He Compromised Intel, Gained Private Info
- Possible AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series Specs Revealed
- Gabe Newell Gives Update on Steam Hack of 2011





they just want to take a shot at Apple. I don't see this actually happening.
ahhh, a breath of fresher air for the morning ^^
"Fair and Reasonable"?? means? As expensive as it can be plus better lawyer team?
hell if it means paying fewer lawyers then even virtually giving it away will be cheaper, the vampires always win.
With Apple around, looking "Fair and Reasonable" shouldn't be too hard. It's all relative.
Apple is actually the one who is being sued by Samsung and Motorola for FRAND patents.
The Apple claims are for NON-FRAND patents....
So if anything this statement by Microsoft insults Samsung and Motorola, the former of which is under investigation for FRAND abuse.
Misleading journalism.