Microsoft Hit With $388 Million Piracy Patent Charge
Microsoft has been ordered to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to software company Uniloc Inc, which specializes in the protection of infrastructure as well as software and games.
A jury in Providence, Rhode Island, deliberated for over a day before delivering the $388 million that will see the end of a six year long case. Filed in October 2003, Uniloc targeted Windows XP as well as a number of Office programs. The company claimed that Mircosoft had infringed on a patent registered to Uniloc that generates unique identities for licensed users and prevents unauthorized use or pirating programs.
According to Bloomberg, Microsoft argued that it used a different method for registering software and that Uniloc’s patent was obvious. “We are very disappointed in the jury verdict,” David Bowermaster, a Microsoft spokesman told Bloomberg in an email. “We believe that we do not infringe, that the patent is invalid and that this award of damages is legally and factually unsupported. We will ask the court to overturn the verdict.”
That said, while Microsoft is clearly unhappy with the ruling, the worst could still be ahead of them. Bloomberg reports that because the jurors found Microsoft’s infringement to be willful, or intentional, the judge could increase the amount of damages by as much as 3 times. Yikes.
According to Uniloc's site the patent on the "System for Software Registration" was filed in 1993 and issued in 1996. Uniloc describes the system as follows:
"The system relies on a portion of digital data or code which is integral to the digital data to be protected by the system. This integral portion is termed the code portion and may include an algorithm that generates a registration number unique to an intending licensee of the digital data based on information supplied by the licensee which characterizes the licensee."
Related Links
Uniloc
Uniloc’s Patent
Bloomberg
- Microsoft ,
- Uniloc ,
- Patent ,
- Infringement ,
- suit
- QOTD: What Would You Remove/Add to Win 7?
- New Acer Netbooks Hits 11.6-inch Territory
- Seagate Delivers "Next-Gen" HDD
- Microsoft: Please Don't Upgrade Win 7 Beta to RC
- AMD Launches Opteron Upgrade Program
- Gigabyte Netbook Features Swivel Touch Screen
- OCZ's First UPS, Made by PC Power & Cooling
- PETA Invading WoW to Stop Baby Seal Slaughter
- Blogs: Your Opinions, Please
- Microsoft Fined $11.9 Million for Office Price-fixing
- Pirate Bay's Anonymity Service Attracts 113,000
- FBI Does Dallas... Data Center Investigation
- iTunes, Amazon, Wal-Mart Pricing Music Variably
- The Blind Demand Return of Kindle's Speech
- Teen Hacker Contracted By Telco Company
- Nintendo Chief: No Price Cuts Planned
- Conficker Gets Update, Does ... Something
- AMD's 'Sabine' Platform Will Support DirectX 11





To be honest, does Microsoft care? It's cornered most of the desktop and netbook arena, and it seems to charge the earth for it's productivity software, especially the professional versions. I think this sum - even when multiplied several times - is probably a drop in the ocean to Bill Gates' empire. I bet the court costs were also large, considering how long this dispute has gone on and the entity involved.