Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Performance per Watt: Streaming Reads

Intel's X25-M Solid State Drive Reviewed
By

The streaming read throughput benchmark reflects what we found in the low-level throughput tests: Intel’s X25-M is extremely quick, while the Samsung SSD takes second place. It is obvious that the Intel 10-channel design has its impact in this test, as the performance results show a larger advantage for the Intel solution than in the throughput tests. Clearly, the controller is doing its job well.

Again, the power consumption of both SSDs is attractively low, especially looking at the level of performance. Let’s see what the performance per watt ratio looks like:

Intel’s drive is much faster, while being more efficient No further questions.

The I/O streaming read efficiency tests were performed on our storage reference test system. Please refer to the test setup page for details.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the UK Article comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display 3 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    mi1ez , 9 September 2008 16:08
    Quote:
    Here it is, the new X25-M; the name sounds very much like an experimental hypersonic plane. And the analogy isn’t far off, since the new flash SSD provides excellent performance.


    lol
  • 0 Hide
    ashish_iub , 9 September 2008 19:41
    What the other companies are doing? They should have had a better performance as they demand to be expertise in this peripheral device. X-25 is going to head ..that's for sure. Waiting to see what the other vendor's do to boost up their performance.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , 9 September 2008 20:26
    On page 13 the final graph looks wrong, given the stream read performace and the average power of the previous graphs the performance per watt for the intel should be closer to 810 not the 5000+ given