Page 1:Intel's Next Top Model - QX9770 at 3.2 GHz
Page 2:TDP of up to 136 Watts
Page 3:X48 Chipset Required
Page 4:Up Close and Personal with the QX9770 - 12 MB L2 Cache and 3.2 GHz
Page 5:QX9770 is 5 % Faster - Overlocking to 4 GHz
Page 6:Models and Pricing
Page 7:Test Setup
Page 8:Software Configuration
Page 9:Benchmarks and Settings
Page 10:3D-Games - UT2004, Prey
Page 11:3D-Games - Quake 4, Warhammer
Page 12:3D-Games - Supreme Commander, Serious Sam 2
Page 13:3D-Rendering - Cinema 4D, 3D-Studio Max
Page 14:Applications - AVG, WinRAR
Page 15:Applications - Photoshop, PDF
Page 16:Applications - Deep Fritz
Page 17:Audio Encoding - iTunes, Lame
Page 18:Synthetic - Sandra CPU
Page 19:Synthetic - Sandra Memory
Page 20:Synthetic - Sandra Multimedia
Page 21:Synthetic - PC-Mark
Page 22:Synthetic - 3DMark
Page 23:Video Encoding - Xvid, Pinnacle Studio
Page 24:Video Encoding - Premiere, Mainconcept
Page 25:Video Encoding - HDTV, DivX
Page 26:Video Encoding - CloneDVD
Page 27:Cocnlusion: Core 2 QX9770 with 3.2 GHz - Top Performer, but not Before 2008
Apparently, our article caused quite a stir at a certain processor company’s headquarters, so we thought it was time to give you an update on what has happened since this article went live.
Intel contacted us in response to this article, informing us that the Core 2 Duo Extreme QX9770 was in no way a “paper tiger”. To back up that claim, Intel Germany sent us a real, tangible silicon version of the chip by courier the next day. Additionally, we received some answers to the questions that had cropped up in our original article.
The specifications of the QX9770 with 3.20 GHz have changed slightly compared to those of the QX9650 with 3.00 GHz. For example, the core voltage has seen a minor increase from 1.2500 Volts to 1.2875 Volts. As such, that’s nothing unusual and could be due to fluctuations in the production process – a normal fact of life for any line of CPUs.
Only three weeks ago, Intel unveiled its 45 nm fabrication technology in the shape of the Penryn processor. However, the only model available at launch was the Extreme Edition model QX9650. Since the Extreme Edition models have always come in at just under €1000 (£715), the energy efficient 45 nm technology will remain out of reach for most users. In other words, for now there will be no real revolution in the mass market.
As we were gearing up to cover the launch of AMD’s highly anticipated Phenom quad-core processor, we received an email with the following information (which is paraphrased).
Intel is planning to unveil a new 45 nm processor with the designation Core 2 Extreme QX9770. This new part will become available in the first quarter of 2008. Furthermore, Intel informed us that we should simulate this new CPU using the QX9650 in or lab, as it wouldn’t be distributing any review samples, since none exist yet.
This is the first time in recent memory that Intel is introducing a new processor without having a concrete model at hand. The obvious conclusion is therefore– Intel is worried about AMD’s Phenom launch and is trying to steal the limelight.
Looking back at the introduction of AMD’s first Athlon 64 processor, we can understand Intel’s anxiety. At the time, Intel’s Netburst architecture was no match for the young and fresh Athlon 64. Back then, the processor heavyweight followed the same strategy, pulling the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition out of its hat at the last minute before AMD’s launch. This part was based on the Northwood core, featured 3 MB of L2 cache, and was basically a repackaged and rebranded Xeon processor.
The new Extreme Edition QX9770 runs on a 400 MHz FSB (1600QDR) and uses an 8x multiplier, resulting in a clock speed of 3.20 GHz. Thus, Intel’s big announcement is basically that it is raising the frequency of its high end CPU by 200 MHz.
This is what a Core 2 Extreme QX9770 could look like come 2008.
CPU-Z-Screenshot of the Core 2 Extreme QX9770 that Intel sent us.
Since there is currently no chipset in the market that (officially) supports FSB1600, Intel suggests using a current X38 motherboard and overclocking the FSB manually. This is both strange and remarkable. After all, Intel has always been a great advocate of using its products within their specifications, putting stability first. What could have motivated this sudden change in attitude, we wonder?
- Intel's Next Top Model - QX9770 at 3.2 GHz
- TDP of up to 136 Watts
- X48 Chipset Required
- Up Close and Personal with the QX9770 - 12 MB L2 Cache and 3.2 GHz
- QX9770 is 5 % Faster - Overlocking to 4 GHz
- Models and Pricing
- Test Setup
- Software Configuration
- Benchmarks and Settings
- 3D-Games - UT2004, Prey
- 3D-Games - Quake 4, Warhammer
- 3D-Games - Supreme Commander, Serious Sam 2
- 3D-Rendering - Cinema 4D, 3D-Studio Max
- Applications - AVG, WinRAR
- Applications - Photoshop, PDF
- Applications - Deep Fritz
- Audio Encoding - iTunes, Lame
- Synthetic - Sandra CPU
- Synthetic - Sandra Memory
- Synthetic - Sandra Multimedia
- Synthetic - PC-Mark
- Synthetic - 3DMark
- Video Encoding - Xvid, Pinnacle Studio
- Video Encoding - Premiere, Mainconcept
- Video Encoding - HDTV, DivX
- Video Encoding - CloneDVD
- Cocnlusion: Core 2 QX9770 with 3.2 GHz - Top Performer, but not Before 2008