Software Configuration
Ad
| System Software & Drivers | |
|---|---|
| Operating System | Windows Vista Enterprise Version 6.0 (Build 6000) |
| DirectX 10 | DirectX 10 (Vista default) |
| DirectX 9 | Version: April 2007 |
| Sound Card | Vista Driver 2.13.0012 (15.03.2007) |
| Graphics Card | Nvidia ForceWare Version 158.18 (32 Bit) WHQL |
| Intel Chipset | Version 8.1.1.1010 (21/11/2006) |
| Intel-Storage | Matrix-Storage Manager 7.0.0.1020 |
| Nvidia Chipset | nForce Driver: 15.00 (02.02.2007) WHQL |
| Java | Java Runtime Environment 6.0 Update 1 |
Our Testbed Systems
- Previous page Test Setup
- Next page Benchmarks and Settings
Google Ads
The CPU Articles and reviews
- AMD Phenom - The Spider Weaves its Web
- Sibling Rivalry - Intel E6750 and Q6600 Overclocking Duel
- Intel’s 45nm Penryn Processor – Hitting 4 GHz with Air Cooling
- Is Cache Size Really The Key To Boosting Performance?
- Budget Overclocker - AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition
- Parallel Processing, Part 1: CPU Cores
- Keeping Your CPU Going If Your Cooler Fails
- [IDF]Centrino 5 Explored
- AMD K10: The Architecture of the Revival?
- Feeling the Squeeze: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6400 Black Edition
Related Content



Apart from neding a new chipset, what's the deal with a mere 5% performance increase for an additional 40% more power consumption.
Given the impressive energy efficiency of the QX9650, I don't understand how so much extra power is drawn for the tiny boost in performance - what's going on?
Thank you for contacting Intel(R) Customer Support.
The only cooling solution we recommend for this processor is the liquid based cooling. We can not guarantee performance nor reliability if an air cooling solution is used.
Please do not hesitate to contact us again if you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Intel(R) Customer Support