X48 Chipset Required

Ad

Intel QX9770 Penryn

The new X48 chipset that is required for the new Extreme Edition CPU will also only be released in the first quarter of 2008. By increasing both the FSB and the TDP, Intel is forcing its customers to buy a completely new chipset.

The technical specifications are slightly different than those of the X38. Here are the highlights:

  • The highest supported front side bus has been raised to 400 MHz (1600QDR)
  • The chipset does not support DDR2 memory.
  • DDR3-1600 is supported on an FSB of 400 MHz (1600QDR)
  • If DDR3-1600 memory is used, only one memory module is allowed per channel. Thus, the buyer must use 2 GB modules to reach 4 GB of RAM.
  • According to Intel, DDR3-1600 will operate at 1.8 Volts and CL8-8-8

The X48 chipset will use the same southbridge as the P35 and X38, namely the ICH9.

Intel Penryn 45nm

Comparing the X48 and the X38
FunctionsX48X38
Front Side Bus800
1066
1333
1600
800
1066
1333
MemoryDDR3-800
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
DDR3-800
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
FSB:DDR3800:800
1066:800
1066:1066
1333:800
1333:1066
1333:1333
1600:1066
1600:1600
800:800
1066:800
1066:1066
1333:800
1333:1066
1333:1333
Supported Timings800 = 5-5-5
1066 = 7-7-7
1333 = 8-8-8
1600 = 8-8-8
800 = 5-5-5
1066 = 7-7-7
1333 = 8-8-8
Memory Voltage800/1066/1333
1.50 Volt +/- 5 %
1600 = 1.80 Volt +/- 5 %
800/1066/1333
1.50 Volt +/- 5 %

Update:
We also asked Intel, whether a new chipset with full official support for the new front side bus speed of 400 MHz (1600QDR) would be required to run the new CPU. After all, Intel’s current high-end X38 chipset is only specified for a maximum front side bus speed of 333 MHz (1333QDR). It seems very unlikely that an OEM computer company such as Dell or HP would ship systems pairing the new CPU with the X38 platform.

Intel’s view of the matter is that it considers its warranty voided if its products are operated outside of their specifications, regardless of whether the product in question is a CPU or a chipset. If a motherboard vendor advertises the overclocking potential of its product, then that company is liable for any damage to the CPU or the chipset that results from overclocking and has to cover the cost.

In other words, if a motherboard maker claims that its board is designed for a 400 MHz FSB (1600QDR), then it has to ensure that the product is up to that task by using voltage regulators that can handle the higher strain without producing errors or becoming unstable.

Based on Intel’s statements on the new chipset for its 400 MHz FSB CPUs (1600QDR), we see that Intel is discouraging the use of the X38 chipset and will only guarantee compatibility with the X48 chipset.

So if we were salespeople in a store and a customer asked us for a motherboard recommendation to go with an FSB1600 CPU, we would always go with the X48 board. After all, if the overclocked X38-based motherboard caused any problems, despite the FSB only running 66 MHz above its stock voltage, we would be faced with additional costs and a very unhappy and unsatisfied customer.

If you buy a Core 2 Extreme QX9700, you should be able to run it in an X38-based board – which is incidentally exactly what Intel suggested we do to test this processor in the first place. However, if things do go wrong and the CPU or board are damaged, things may turn sour for you. Intel would most likely waive any warranty claims on the grounds that the chipset was being used outside of its specifications.


Intel QX9770Intel QX9770 Update

Intel QX9770 Update


Talkback
spuddyt 19/11/2007 06:29
Hide
-0+
spuddyt

hang on? pg 4, the table is in german (not that it matters, since the nm doesn't really change between language...

spuddyt 19/11/2007 06:32
Hide
-0+
spuddyt

and on pg 7, that comment about it being for the enthusiast segment..... i'm not so sure...... since if its basically just a higher FSB version, most enthusiasts will just take it way higher anyway

mi1ez 21/11/2007 02:46
Hide
-0+
mi1ez

I think it's hilarious how concerned intel were at the last article- it didn't put that bad a light on it as I remember...

topman 21/11/2007 10:31
Hide
-0+
topman

lol intel got that CPU to you qwick and i am glad i did not by a x38m i would of bin pist D:

Wild9 22/11/2007 03:42
Hide
-0+
Wild9

More upgrade confusion..great if you have wads of cash. Not so great for Intel as most people don't.

MJ_Frosty 22/11/2007 09:46
Hide
-0+
MJ_Frosty

Best and most greatest selfish example of industry driven dribble I have ever seen. Pointless and further more petty baby steps towards getting the high stand. Nice.

raotor 23/11/2007 12:22
Hide
-0+
raotor

Can't really see the point of this CPU.

Apart from neding a new chipset, what's the deal with a mere 5% performance increase for an additional 40% more power consumption.

Given the impressive energy efficiency of the QX9650, I don't understand how so much extra power is drawn for the tiny boost in performance - what's going on?

Capitannimo 19/06/2008 07:25
Hide
-0+
Capitannimo

I think its important that you incorporate into your review on the qx9770 the following info I got from Intel support:


Thank you for contacting Intel(R) Customer Support.

The only cooling solution we recommend for this processor is the liquid based cooling. We can not guarantee performance nor reliability if an air cooling solution is used.

Please do not hesitate to contact us again if you need further assistance.

Sincerely,

Intel(R) Customer Support

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads