X48 Chipset Required
The new X48 chipset that is required for the new Extreme Edition CPU will also only be released in the first quarter of 2008. By increasing both the FSB and the TDP, Intel is forcing its customers to buy a completely new chipset.
The technical specifications are slightly different than those of the X38. Here are the highlights:
- The highest supported front side bus has been raised to 400 MHz (1600QDR)
- The chipset does not support DDR2 memory.
- DDR3-1600 is supported on an FSB of 400 MHz (1600QDR)
- If DDR3-1600 memory is used, only one memory module is allowed per channel. Thus, the buyer must use 2 GB modules to reach 4 GB of RAM.
- According to Intel, DDR3-1600 will operate at 1.8 Volts and CL8-8-8
The X48 chipset will use the same southbridge as the P35 and X38, namely the ICH9.
| Functions | X48 | X38 |
|---|---|---|
| Front Side Bus | 800 1066 1333 1600 | 800 1066 1333 |
| Memory | DDR3-800 DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 DDR3-1600 | DDR3-800 DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 |
| FSB:DDR3 | 800:800 1066:800 1066:1066 1333:800 1333:1066 1333:1333 1600:1066 1600:1600 | 800:800 1066:800 1066:1066 1333:800 1333:1066 1333:1333 |
| Supported Timings | 800 = 5-5-5 1066 = 7-7-7 1333 = 8-8-8 1600 = 8-8-8 | 800 = 5-5-5 1066 = 7-7-7 1333 = 8-8-8 |
| Memory Voltage | 800/1066/1333 1.50 Volt +/- 5 % 1600 = 1.80 Volt +/- 5 % | 800/1066/1333 1.50 Volt +/- 5 % |
|
Update: We also asked Intel, whether a new chipset with full official support for the new front side bus speed of 400 MHz (1600QDR) would be required to run the new CPU. After all, Intel’s current high-end X38 chipset is only specified for a maximum front side bus speed of 333 MHz (1333QDR). It seems very unlikely that an OEM computer company such as Dell or HP would ship systems pairing the new CPU with the X38 platform. Intel’s view of the matter is that it considers its warranty voided if its products are operated outside of their specifications, regardless of whether the product in question is a CPU or a chipset. If a motherboard vendor advertises the overclocking potential of its product, then that company is liable for any damage to the CPU or the chipset that results from overclocking and has to cover the cost. In other words, if a motherboard maker claims that its board is designed for a 400 MHz FSB (1600QDR), then it has to ensure that the product is up to that task by using voltage regulators that can handle the higher strain without producing errors or becoming unstable. Based on Intel’s statements on the new chipset for its 400 MHz FSB CPUs (1600QDR), we see that Intel is discouraging the use of the X38 chipset and will only guarantee compatibility with the X48 chipset. So if we were salespeople in a store and a customer asked us for a motherboard recommendation to go with an FSB1600 CPU, we would always go with the X48 board. After all, if the overclocked X38-based motherboard caused any problems, despite the FSB only running 66 MHz above its stock voltage, we would be faced with additional costs and a very unhappy and unsatisfied customer. If you buy a Core 2 Extreme QX9700, you should be able to run it in an X38-based board – which is incidentally exactly what Intel suggested we do to test this processor in the first place. However, if things do go wrong and the CPU or board are damaged, things may turn sour for you. Intel would most likely waive any warranty claims on the grounds that the chipset was being used outside of its specifications. |
- Previous page TDP of up to 136 Watts
- Next page Up Close and Personal with the QX9770...
- AMD Phenom - The Spider Weaves its Web
- Sibling Rivalry - Intel E6750 and Q6600 Overclocking Duel
- Intel’s 45nm Penryn Processor – Hitting 4 GHz with Air Cooling
- Is Cache Size Really The Key To Boosting Performance?
- Budget Overclocker - AMD's Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Black Edition
- Parallel Processing, Part 1: CPU Cores
- Keeping Your CPU Going If Your Cooler Fails
- [IDF]Centrino 5 Explored
- AMD K10: The Architecture of the Revival?
- Feeling the Squeeze: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6400 Black Edition





hang on? pg 4, the table is in german (not that it matters, since the nm doesn't really change between language...
and on pg 7, that comment about it being for the enthusiast segment..... i'm not so sure...... since if its basically just a higher FSB version, most enthusiasts will just take it way higher anyway
I think it's hilarious how concerned intel were at the last article- it didn't put that bad a light on it as I remember...
lol intel got that CPU to you qwick and i am glad i did not by a x38m i would of bin pist D:
More upgrade confusion..great if you have wads of cash. Not so great for Intel as most people don't.
Best and most greatest selfish example of industry driven dribble I have ever seen. Pointless and further more petty baby steps towards getting the high stand. Nice.
Can't really see the point of this CPU.
Apart from neding a new chipset, what's the deal with a mere 5% performance increase for an additional 40% more power consumption.
Given the impressive energy efficiency of the QX9650, I don't understand how so much extra power is drawn for the tiny boost in performance - what's going on?
I think its important that you incorporate into your review on the qx9770 the following info I got from Intel support:
Thank you for contacting Intel(R) Customer Support.
The only cooling solution we recommend for this processor is the liquid based cooling. We can not guarantee performance nor reliability if an air cooling solution is used.
Please do not hesitate to contact us again if you need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Intel(R) Customer Support