GEIL Memory – An Overclocking Natural
We equipped our test systems with 2 GB of memory, with our budget set at a maximum of €65. Memory maker GEIL offers some excellent products in this price range. We finally settled on the DDR2-800 modules of the Black Dragon Edition with the designation GB22GB6400C4DC, which are sold as a 2 GB set (2 x 1 GB).
Don’t take those two red LEDs the wrong way – they aren’t meant as a warning, they’re more of a fashion statement. In our test, we were able to overclock GEIL’s modules to remarkable heights.
Although the label on the modules states an operating voltage of 2.0 Volts, we reduced the voltage to 1.95 V for our overclocking tests. Despite this reduction, our stress test tool Prime95 ran completely stably.
In our test, we were able to push the memory as high as DDR2-900 without having to change the latencies from their stock settings of CL 4.0-4-4-12 or raising the voltage above 1.95 V. Despite this high frequency, it still didn’t get warm enough to require any cooling.
- Previous page Highlights of the Gigabyte Board –...
- Next page Cooler - Zalman's CNPS9700LED is Ideal
- Comparing X38 Hardware, Part 1: DDR2 Motherboards
- Is Cache Size Really The Key To Boosting Performance?
- Three Asus, DFI and Foxconn P35 Mobos
- Intel X38 chipset: Like a Porsche with the Handbrake On
- MSI P35 Platinum Makes a Comeback
- Can MicroATX Boards Do the Job?
- Eight P35-DDR2 Motherboards Compared
- Pipe Dreams: Six P35-DDR3 Motherboards Compared
- Seven 650i SLI Motherboards Compared
- Intel Intros 3-Series Chipsets with FSB1333 and DDR3




Wrong my Q6600 is 1.26V although it runs slightly higher in practice.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums [...] s/Quad.jpg
Fortunately for myself, my Q6600 is 1.28v core, and hits 3.6GHz with only slight bump.
Indeed electron migration is a significant issue at high Vcore but realistically most of us overclocking are probably running 6-12 month cycles on our hardware (at least from my experience) and the cost of killing a mid range part every year against taking a top end part is still more cost effective.
That's given only one CPU in the past 15 that I've OC'd have failed (possibly luck?) on me and that was due to a faulty voltage regulator on my motherboard