Intel's Rosepoint Puts Wi-Fi Radio, Atom CPU on Single Chip
A dual-core Atom CPU and a digital Wi-Fi radio on the same chip.
Once the king of the netbook market with its Atom chipset, Intel now faces stiff competition from the likes of Nvidia and AMD. However, a current research project at Intel shows that Intel hasn't lost its edge just yet. Dubbed Rosepoint, Wired reports that, after years of hard work, Intel engineers have managed to squeeze a digital 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi radio and a low-power Atom CPU onto the same chip.
Though it sounds simple enough, sticking these two components onto the same chip is no easy feat. Wired's Robert McMillan explains that Intel's researchers not only had to figure out a way to take a complex analogue WiFi chip (with its complicated design and customized circuits operating on a continuum of voltages) and boil it down to the tiny scale required, the company also needed to figure out a way to eliminate radio wave emissions that can cause interference between the two components.
The resulting chip allows not only for fewer chips (which means a lower cost) but also heightened power efficiency. Though Rosepoint is only in the research stages right now, it could show up in laptops and phones by 2015. As if all of this weren't bad-ass enough, Intel is also looking at ways to radio antennas on-chip, too. It might be a while before we hear more details, but it sure is nice to hear what's going on behind closed doors over in Santa Clara, isn't it?
Head on over to Wired for the full details on how Intel has gotten a digital WiFi radio and an Atom CPU to play house.
Follow @JaneMcEntegart on Twitter for the latest news.
- Intel-Atom ,
- Rosepoint ,
- WiFi-radio ,
- on-chip ,
- wireless
- Intel Readies New 313 Series Caching SSDs for Ivy Bridge
- AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series Specs Revealed in Leak
- Court Ruling Could See Pirate Bay Blocked in the UK
- Samsung Unveils Two New Galaxy Phones Headed for Europe
- Microsoft Nukes Recent Office for iPad Rumor
- Nvidia, ZTE Intros Tegra 2 + Icera Smartphone
- Intel Reveals More Details of Ivy Bridge Variants at ISSCC
- Ubuntu For Android to be Shown Next Week at MWC 2012
- Microsoft Accuses Google of Bypassing IE Privacy Settings
- AMD Piledriver Cores to Use Energy Recovery Tech
- Noctua Announces Low-Profile NH-L12 CPU Cooler
- SanDisk Develops World’s Smallest 128Gb NAND Chip
- Sapphire Unveils Edge-HD3 Mini PC
- Guild Wars 2 Public Beta Signup Limited Time Only
- Windows 8 Will (Finally) Include Support for UK English
- UK High Court Allows Legal Claim to Be Served via Facebook
- Former iPhone Factory Workers Call for Reform in Open Letter
- UK's 4G to Interfere with TVs of Nearly 1 Million People






How is this different to what ARM SoC providers have been doing for years?
How is this different to what ARM SoC providers have been doing for years?
Elaborate?
I didn't feel the article was clear about how this was different to the SoC concept which is used so generally (especially with ARM-core products, e.g. OMAP850) as I'm not an expert on the subject and there's not enough detail to show what support circuitry is still needed. I should have phrased my comment "It would be good to have more detail on how this is different..." assuming that it is.
As far as I know aje21, ARM SoC's haven't been able to include radio communications functions on the die yet, requiring them to be a separate chip.
OK, thanks.