Source: Tom's hardware UK – Keywords: HDTV, Nvidia, ATI
Categories: Graphics
Introduction
HD is an acronym that’s become so popular since a little more than a year ago that we could almost forget what it stands for : High Definition. Two letters which promise you an even greater home-cinema experience than before in the time of the now obsolete DVD. But is it so simple to benefit from HD?
No. You actually must spend an unreasonable sum on a compatible flat screen television and media suite. And where are PCs in all this? For a long time, they couldn’t face up to HD DVD or Blu-ray discs; they’re now back in the HD good books thanks to new generation Geforce 8 and Radeon HD 2000 graphic cards. We wanted to know what was what for ourselves, so we tested both the video Nvidia PureVideo HD and ATI Avivo HD. Between the ATI and Nvidia, which has the best performance? The best quality? Are those new graphics cards enough to transform an ageing system into the latest HD box? The answer is in the following pages…


- Next page Recap
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money UK: August 2007
- Leadtek's GeForce 8800 Performance Leviathan
- HD 2600 & GeForce 8600: Where's the Mid-Range?
- San Base: Computer Graphics Avant-Garde
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: July 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: June 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: May 2007
- Foxconn's GeForce 8600 GTS
- Spring VGA Charts 2007
Other than that, very timely as am at the start of the upgrade cycle and find myself having to buy a PCI-E graphics card.
To be fair, the Radeon 2400 should have been compared against a 8400GS, as they are the same price, and any question about drivers affecting performance could have been answered by running the 2600 on the same drver as the 2400.