Source: Tom's hardware UK – Keywords: HDTV, Nvidia, ATI
Categories: Graphics
Test results: Consumption
We will finish our tests by a measurement of the power consumption of our Athlon 64 3800+’s basic configuration. This test should determine if the superiority of ATI cards when reading VC-1 encoded films translates into a real gain when it comes to electricity. As shown by the above table, this is actually the case.
The reading of the VC-1 increases the Geforce’s configuration consumption by 31% instead of 21.5% but only on the HD 2600 XT. The final difference is of 4 W. A 4W difference may seem negligible on a desktop but it isn’t on a laptop. The ATI cards are therefore capable of delivering better battery life to a laptop reading VC-1 or HD MPEG2 encoded HD films.
This is all well and good when taken alone, But in the case of a H.264 film, the phenomenon is reversed and it is the configuration equipped with the Geforce 8600 GT that consumes 4W less than the one equipped with the Radeon HD 2600 XT. So it’s a draw.
- Previous page Test results : image quality
- Next page Conclusion
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money UK: August 2007
- Leadtek's GeForce 8800 Performance Leviathan
- HD 2600 & GeForce 8600: Where's the Mid-Range?
- San Base: Computer Graphics Avant-Garde
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: July 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: June 2007
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money: May 2007
- Foxconn's GeForce 8600 GTS
- Spring VGA Charts 2007
Other than that, very timely as am at the start of the upgrade cycle and find myself having to buy a PCI-E graphics card.
To be fair, the Radeon 2400 should have been compared against a 8400GS, as they are the same price, and any question about drivers affecting performance could have been answered by running the 2600 on the same drver as the 2400.