Overall Performance, Pricing and Performance for Money

Ad

Overall Performance Nvidia and ATI fps Percent
Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) 2756.0 100.0
Geforce 8800 Ultra OC (768 MB) 2751.0 99.8
Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) 2599.2 94.3
Radeon HD3870 OC CF (512 MB) 2550.4 92.5
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC CF (512 MB) 2500.3 90.7
Radeon HD3870 X2 (2x512 MB) 2379.5 86.3
Radeon HD3870 OC (512 MB) 2079.0 75.4
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC (512 MB) 1945.4 70.6
MSI Geforce 8600 GT OC (256 MB) 1025.0 37.2
Sapphire Radeon HD 3650 OC (512 MB) 935.3 33.9
Radeon HD 2600 Pro (256 MB) 693.8 25.2
Sapphire Radeon HD 3450 (512 MB) 332.4 12.1
Radeon HD 2400 Pro HM (256/1023 MB) 308.4 11.2

 

Overal Performance ATI 2x00 vs 3x50 fps Percent
Sapphire Radeon HD 3650 OC (512 MB) 935.3 100.0
Radeon HD 2600 Pro (256 MB) 693.8 74.2
Sapphire Radeon HD 3450 (512 MB) 332.4 35.5
Radeon HD 2400 Pro HM (256/1023 MB) 308.4 33.0

 

Pricing Euro
Geforce 8800 Ultra OC (768 MB) 553
Radeon HD3870 OC CF (512 MB) 372
Radeon HD3870 X2 (2x512 MB) 346
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC CF (512 MB) 318
Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) 259
Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) 205
Radeon HD3870 OC (512 MB) 186
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC (512 MB) 159
Sapphire Radeon HD 3650 OC (512 MB) 89
MSI Geforce 8600 GT OC (256 MB) 76
Radeon HD 2600 Pro (256 MB) 48
Sapphire Radeon HD 3450 (512 MB) 33
Radeon HD 2400 Pro HM (256/1023 MB) 30

 

Performance for Money Euros per Frame
Geforce 8800 Ultra OC (768 MB) 0.201
Radeon HD3870 OC CF (512 MB) 0.146
Radeon HD3870 X2 (2x512 MB) 0.145
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC CF (512 MB) 0.127
Sapphire Radeon HD 3450 (512 MB) 0.099
Radeon HD 2400 Pro HM (256/1023 MB) 0.097
Sapphire Radeon HD 3650 OC (512 MB) 0.095
Geforce 8800 GTS OC (512 MB) 0.094
Radeon HD3870 OC (512 MB) 0.089
Radeon HD3850 Xtreme PCS OC (512 MB) 0.082
Geforce 8800 GT OC (512 MB) 0.079
MSI Geforce 8600 GT OC (256 MB) 0.074
Radeon HD 2600 Pro (256 MB) 0.069


Talkback
Wild9 20/02/2008 01:16
Hide
-0+
Wild9

Quote :Ever since the 2x00 series, ATI’s graphics chips have supported HD video encoding


Shouldn't that be decoding? :)

mactronix 20/02/2008 10:54
Hide
-0+
mactronix


Its all well and good comparing like for like but we never seem to get any info that would be relevant to the people who may consider upgrading to these models ie people with 1950 pro's or 7950's .
mactronix

Solitaire 21/02/2008 01:58
Hide
-0+
Solitaire

^ Yeah. Not to mention people running DX9 and with no intention of being Vista-nated.

mactronix 21/02/2008 04:59
Hide
-0+
mactronix

@ Solitaire
"Vista-nated" I like that im gonna start using that :)

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads