Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: Guide, Macs, Gaming
Categories: Gaming
The Macs to Test
The second machine a 15” MacBook Pro is also a laptop. It is essentially the basic version with a 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo (Santa Rosa with a 800 MHz bus). The 15.4” screen in 1440 x 900 is animated by a Nvidia graphic card: a 128 MB Geforce 8600M GT. Apple have modified the card’s frequency: it works at 504 MHz (GPU) and 635 MHz (memory) while Nvidia recommend 600 MHz (GPU) and 700 MHz (memory) . The second interesting point is that the card has more memory under Windows (512 MB). The reason is simple: the graphic card is TurboCache (this feature allows it to recover some video memory from the live memory via the PCI-Express) but unfortunately the Apple driver doesn’t handle that technology. As we will see, this will have an impact sometimes. The Windows tests were carried out with Windows XP Home (SP2).
The third test machine is a 24”iMac. It is the more costly version, with a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo processor (800 MHz bus) and 2 GB of RAM. The graphics card which animates the screen (in1920 x 1200) is an Ati Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT. As the name suggests, it is a card originally intended for laptops. Apple paces its card at 600/680 (GPU/memory). Ati recommend between 600 and 700 MHz for the GPU and between 700 and 750 MHz for the memory. The desktop version works at 800/1100 MHz. The card is accompanied by 256 MB of video memory. The tests in Windows use Windows Vista Ultra Edition.
Mac OS X has several advantages: the system is stable, the installation is simple (you just need to copy the contents of the CD onto the hard disk) and these games are usually best-sellers. A small hiccup is that they often come with a small (or sometimes big) delay. Another interesting point is that Mac OS X uses OpenGL to accelerate its graphic interface, the graphic cards supports this API very well and the performances are generally good.

- Previous page Introduction
- Next page Solutions and Emulation
- To Leech and to Share - Fibrionic's BitTorrent Box
- Vista Workshop – Performance Boost with 8GB of RAM
- Hardware News Roundup - February 2008
- Candid Camcorders - A brand new guide to HD Camcorders
- Upgrade Modules – Remote Controls for Media Centers
- Build Your Own System Rescue CD
- Neuros OSD vs. Archos AV500: Face-Off
- Christmas Buyers' Guide 2007: Media Players
- Christmas Buyers' Guide 2007: Last minute gift ideas
- An introduction to LAN file-sharing protocols

Do you mean ultimate? (as far as I'm aware there is no "ultra" version of vista) and was it ultimate 64bit or 32bit?
There is a 256 version of the MacBook Pro, which if you are a gamer would be the one you go for...
You CAN scale the res on all those machines, and even have the apps autoswitch them, so I don't understand your comment that the Mac cannot do resolution scaling so you had to go with full res...
While I agree you should not be buying a Mac if what you want is gaming, this article was just uninformed....
I still found the review very interesting because it directly compares the performance with Parallels and VMWare to OS X native and Windows native. One of the big selling points of Parallels (which I bought) is that it emulates accelerated 3D graphics in Windows. And this review shows that this is just marketing hot air as that 3D acceleration makes the difference between 5 FPS and 1 FPS, 5 times as fast in marketing speak, still completely unusable in the real world.
So, big thanks for making the effort!
PS: I am not a native english speaker myself but the english in this article is pretty hard to understand in places. I am sure you'd find english-speaking volunteers to edit / proof read this...
But some readers jump to conclusions (e.g. "Bottomline, Macs are no good for games"--geez did you read this at all?), and even the writers of this article have many misconceptions--it is obvious you are out of your element a bit. But I applaud your efforts nonetheless, don't get me wrong.
Windows is basically 'owned' now by OS X, OS X has Windows running in a window, or available at the touch of a button. And there are plenty of instances of "It is even faster, generally, than on Windows."
Thanks for pointing out that even WINDOWS runs better on Mac! Which it does. And, you don't have to rely on Windows horrible and almost complete lack of security.