Problems with Installations

Ad

The results speak volumes. Mobile graphic cards and recent games do not go hand in hand. The performances, without being completely catastrophic, are weak. Even if the MacBook Pro is a laptop which performs relatively well with regards to games it is still a laptop. Fans of recent video games should really lean towards buying a dedicated desktop.

Let’s talk a little of another aspect, apart the pure technique, and see if Macs are suitable to play.

Laborious installations

Mac Monitor

Two points which are going to bother potential gamers lie with the DVD player and Boot Camp. The majority of Macs are equipped with optical drives which are not great which aren’t renowned for their speed. The iMac and the Mac Mini are equipped with DVD players but they’re slow, much slower than a 5.25” dedicated DVD player. On the MacBook and the 15” MacBook Pros Apple uses ultra slim drives, only 9.5mm in height (the classic model measures 12mm), but are even slower (some do not go faster than 4x). There’s no trouble in reading DVD’s but to install a game is a different story. The installs are laborious in both Windows and Mac OS X.

Mouse, keyboard and USB ports

Another problem is the handling devices. The Apple keyboard, while classy and pleasing to the eye, is not really adapted to games. The stroke of the keys is too weak and uncomfortable because they are too flat. In additions to this, certain keys are absent in the Apple layout, which can be bothersome. The ˛ button is not present in Apple keyboards, while certain Windows games require it. Another problem lies the Apple mouse. It’s not exact because the ball used to replace the scroll wheel is a little off. True also, although this only applies to the iMac, is the complaint that the cable is much too short. In practice, if you are required to perform large movements then you risk hitting the right corner of your keyboard. Finally the Apple Laptops (MacBook and MacBook Pro) only offer two USB ports. This means that if you are using an external keyboard and mouse that that’s your lot.

Mouse Lead

The quality of the monitors

Finally we come to the monitors. As mentioned several times before in our tests, the LCD screens must be used in their native resolution to avoid redimensioning and the blurriness that comes in tow. The problem comes from the fact that the redimensioning of Apple screens is poorly handled by the electronics and badly done. In Windows, we can ask the graphic card to do it for us and the results are always better. The 24” iMac has an IPS screen. Its reactivity is nothing to write home about but it is usable. The laptops tested had TN screens which have the same issue. They are correct but nothing more. A good TN 2ms screen is of course much better.


Talkback

rtfm 15/02/2008 01:29
Hide
-0+
rtfm
The Bottom Line (corrected): Macs = No good for games (maybe battleships and doom II)
human_error 15/02/2008 04:28
Hide
-0+
human_error
Quote :The Windows part was tested with Windows Vista Ultra Edition.


Do you mean ultimate? (as far as I'm aware there is no "ultra" version of vista) and was it ultimate 64bit or 32bit?
Akula971 15/02/2008 07:17
Hide
-0+
Akula971
A very weak and uninformed review. The MacBook and MacBookPro are not designed for gaming, but for media and business use. So why test them? The IMacs that can play games very well, Just search in Youtube.com for "Imac crysis" and watch the videos. Why did they use Vista? everyone knows that it creates a huge performance hit for games, that why Mac Gamers who use boot camp use Windows XP. The bottom of the range MacPro was excluded? why? because it might have shown a result that the authors didn't like? it only costs $2299. Not $3000 and comes with the HD2600 XT card not the 7300 mentioned in the article. I guess the article was written some ago before 10.5.1/2 as both updates have enhanced features that benefit gaming and in bootcamp you can put any Windows graphics card in. I guess that Pierre already had his conclusion and wrote an article to back it up. Very poor composition, certainly not constructive journalism! Why not find someone who knows about Mac's to write an article on getting the best out of gaming on a mac, just pop along to http://forums.macrumors.com/forumdisplay.php?f=125 there are lots of people there who could tell you differently. Overall a disappointing article for its lack of accurate information and depth.
ebernet 15/02/2008 08:28
Hide
-0+
ebernet
Pretty bad review....
There is a 256 version of the MacBook Pro, which if you are a gamer would be the one you go for...
You CAN scale the res on all those machines, and even have the apps autoswitch them, so I don't understand your comment that the Mac cannot do resolution scaling so you had to go with full res...
While I agree you should not be buying a Mac if what you want is gaming, this article was just uninformed....
orthorim 16/02/2008 02:54
Hide
-0+
orthorim
Good points above - a proper review should use the latest machines.

I still found the review very interesting because it directly compares the performance with Parallels and VMWare to OS X native and Windows native. One of the big selling points of Parallels (which I bought) is that it emulates accelerated 3D graphics in Windows. And this review shows that this is just marketing hot air as that 3D acceleration makes the difference between 5 FPS and 1 FPS, 5 times as fast in marketing speak, still completely unusable in the real world.

So, big thanks for making the effort!

PS: I am not a native english speaker myself but the english in this article is pretty hard to understand in places. I am sure you'd find english-speaking volunteers to edit / proof read this...
Macbrewer 16/02/2008 09:35
Hide
-0+
Macbrewer
Face it, the MAC is a far better computer because it has support for a far better operating system. Windows is just BS, as you will see quite easily for yourself if you actually use the computer and don't just play games. Life is short folks, do yourself a favor and give it a try. Be warned though, it's very true, once you go Mac you don't go back.

But some readers jump to conclusions (e.g. "Bottomline, Macs are no good for games"--geez did you read this at all?), and even the writers of this article have many misconceptions--it is obvious you are out of your element a bit. But I applaud your efforts nonetheless, don't get me wrong.

Windows is basically 'owned' now by OS X, OS X has Windows running in a window, or available at the touch of a button. And there are plenty of instances of "It is even faster, generally, than on Windows."

Thanks for pointing out that even WINDOWS runs better on Mac! Which it does. And, you don't have to rely on Windows horrible and almost complete lack of security.
darthpoik 18/02/2008 02:02
Hide
-0+
darthpoik
Macs suck
darthpoik 18/02/2008 02:24
Hide
-0+
darthpoik
What we wanted was a more direct comparison between hardware and OS. Macs use PC hardware now so the comparison should be much easier. I suspect Tom is being paid, forced or coerced into not showing us this important comparison. Macs suck but I suspect their OS is far less addled than vista.
Hyperchio 19/02/2008 01:45
Hide
-0+
Hyperchio
Are They Any Good For Gaming? The reveiw is flawed in some ways yes, but the definitive answer is that if you want to play the latest and best games, why get a mac?

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads