Source: Tom's hardware UK – Keywords: Geforce, Radeon, Budget
Categories: Graphics
HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo
The Radeon HD 2600 Pro offers much better performance. Compared to Nvidia’s 8500 GT, you get 50 percent performance more performance for only €10 more. The Radeon 2600 XT does a little better where the price performance ratio is concerned (for the ATI cards), costing 0.096 Euro/frame where the 2600 Pro costs 0.112 Euro/frame. For comparison, the Geforce 8600 GT costs 0.091 Euro/frame. However, the two products are so close in pricing (72 to 90 Euros) that the cost for shipping and handling or a minor price adjustment may tip the balance one way or the other.
On the whole HIS’ Radeon HD 2600 Pro is a marvellous product. It sports a UV-light sensitive fan casing, an IceQ cooler with a very quiet fan, and increased clock speeds that are guaranteed to work by the manufacturer and are preconfigured independently of the driver. While MSI’s HD 2600 Pro uses 256 MB of DDR3 memory, HIS opts for 512 MB of the DDR2 variety. This trade-off pays off. In the overall performance, HIS’ larger, slower RAM (525MHz) beats the smaller, faster RAM (700MHz) on the MSI card. For the most part, the larger memory allows better performance at higher resolutions.
The card’s 3D performance is sufficient to play any current game at maximum detail level. If you plan to play more complex titles such as Oblivion or want to run your games at higher resolutions, you may need to disable FSAA or shadows. To make up for this, you can enable HDR rendering or blooming effects, which is a great boon visually to games like Oblivion, Rogue Universe or Two Worlds.
The 2600 Pro’s power consumption is comparable to that off the 8600 GT. The IceQ cooler handles the chip’s heat extremely well. In 2D mode, the card idles at 40 °C, under 3D load, the temperature climbs only slightly to 46°C.
The stock frequency of a Radeon 2600 Pro’s graphics processor (GPU) is 600 MHz, but HIS raises the GPU frequency to 650 MHz. This setting is independent of the driver, as it is preconfigured on the card. The video memory of an HD 2600 Pro card usually runs at 400 MHz. Again, HIS uses higher settings in its Turbo version, increasing the memory speed to 525 MHz.
Be warned! Additional overclocking voids your card’s warranty, so any OC-experiments you choose to conduct are at your own risk. Although the IceQ card already runs at higher clock speeds than a standard version, there is still some headroom left. We used the ATI/AMD driver from the company’s website for out OC tests. The Overdrive section has received a slight revision in version 7.9 of the Catalyst driver suite. The Auto-Tune feature now switches to a second monitor that displays GPU load and temperature while the optimal clock speed is determined for the GPU and memory.
This process takes a fair bit of time and doesn’t always represent a completely reliable result. Before you can use the higher clock speeds determined by the tool, you have to test your settings with the ‘Test Custom Clock’ button. If the test is successful, the card can be set to use the new frequencies by clicking ‘Accept’. In our testbed system, our review sample was able to reach 740 MHz (GPU) and 590 MHz (memory) without any difficulty and was completely stable at these speeds.
- Previous page Radeon HD 2400 Pro Crossfire
- Next page MSI Radeon HD 2600 Pro Noise Free...
- The Best Gaming Graphics Cards For Your Money: October 2007
- Can Integrated Graphics Cut It For Gaming Or HTPC?
- ATI's Radeon 2600 XT Remixed
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for your Money: A September 2007 Guide
- The Revolution Will Not be Televised - HD Video on PC
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- The Best Gaming Video Cards for the Money UK: August 2007
- Leadtek's GeForce 8800 Performance Leviathan
- HD 2600 & GeForce 8600: Where's the Mid-Range?
- San Base: Computer Graphics Avant-Garde







Im a bit lost for words really i had come to expect more from you guys.
How come i started reading a review about entry level cards yet when we get to the benchmarks we have the full Nvidea range on display including a 8800gts.Its just rediculous.The title clearly says DX10 on a budget so how is a 8800gts relevant?
I can understand having the 8600gts in the benchmarks but why no review ?is it by chance that the MSI card isnt really a 8600GTS as it dosent even have a referance chip and the pcb is different?
Even if im wrong on that and you havent used the T2D256E-HD-OC as i suspect you have from the results then why on earth is the 2600XT running 7.6 drivers and the PRO 7.9.
You cant possably hope to conduct a fair and unbiased set of tests if you are not using the same drivers.
There are so many holes in this im wondering if you havent taken the Nvidea dollar as it sems so biased towards them and there products.
Really Really dissapointed
Mactronix
Mactronix, I dont think that they are suggesting that a 8800GTS is a budget segment card. Instead i believe that they are using this card as a 'benchmark' to show how the budget segment shape up to mainstream. This way you can see the performance gap between 8600, 8400, and 2400, 2600 and how they relate to the 8800GTS. This will hepl people decide wether it is worth them investing a little more money. This is reinforced by the fact that they didnt include it in the 'look at performing cards' and at all in the conclusion either.
While i understand what you are saying it dosent bear out simply because they havent included the 2900 in the benchmarks and if they were trying to compare to the mainstreem then surley it should have been there?
Mactronix
While I do not assume to know everything PC related, this card has been a dissapointment in that no matter what config I try it does not boot to bios when using the DVI cables with LCD monitors.. No matter what I try I can not access BIOS and it will give a blank screen and then open Windows 30 seconds later. However when I use the VGA cables it boots to boot screen and I am able to get into bios.. Any ideas? I have tried different monitors and cables and the results are the same. I really dont want to have to use two converters when I have 2 dvi monitors and the outlets for them std. Feel like this should not even be an issue on such a modern board