Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Conclusion

by

Overall, the GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB is interesting for a few reasons. Based on a largely more powerful G92 (24 %) than the one on the GeForce 8800 GT, it manages to outperform the GeForce 8800 GTX. The latter has sometimes got the upper hand (Age of Empires III, Crysis), but is more often than not beaten (Test Drive Unlimited, STALKER, Unreal Tournament 3, Call of Duty 4) or is on a par globally (Supreme Commander, Oblivion, World In Conflict). It all depends on the nature of each game and its demands in shading. Memory-wise, we remain at the same level as the GeForce 8800 GT; whether it is in capacity or in bandwidth (it only increases by 8%).

Given its £150-170 (€200-240) price tag, the choice between a GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB and the 8800 GTX is clear despite the fact that the latter is the only one to maintain the triple SLI support. Let’s note that the GeForce 8800 GTX is at the end of its lifespan and should quickly disappear. On the other hand, the unbalanced character of this new 8800 GTS which almost only counts on its raw throughput to outgrow the 8800 GT 512 MB shows its limitations. The latter is taken back by only 10% on average although its price tag is roughly 20% lower. The performance-price ratio remains in favour of the 8800 GT and the gap between the two is too small to really be significant.

We should note that this 8800 GTS 512 MB gives Nvidia the ability to present another card next to the 8800 GT without being ridiculous. Compared to the previous 8800 GTS, the increase is quite important with 31 % on average when put against the 640 MB version. With regards to availability, Nvidia promised it’ll be on our shelves; we’ll see what it really is in a few of days.

Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS 512 MB After the 8800 GT earthquake, Nvidia own with its new 8800 GTS a second coherent card in its catalogue. The evolution of performances compared to the previous 8800 GTS is interesting, yet by counting on computational power alone, the card has difficulties seperating itself from the 8800 GT.

The Pros

  • Performances almost equivalent to that of the 8800 GTX for a cheaper price
  • Decline in power consumption and with quiet performance.
  • PureVideo 2

The Cons

  • A performance/price ratio less appealing than that of the 8800 GT, which isn’t much less efficient.
Share:
6
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Read the comments on the forums
spuddyt 11/12/2007 20:57
Hide
-0+

joy, so basically, get the 8800gt

bobwya 12/12/2007 01:03
Hide
-0+

OK more tweaking around the ages... Like whatever...

We need a 9xxx series card with 1Gb DDR4 RAM like yesterday please Nvidia!!

Bob

Daveyboy 12/12/2007 23:56
Hide
-0+

Yeah it is about time we seen a card faster than the gtx, I'm hardly excited that a year later the new cards are "almost" as fast as the gtx

MasterDex 16/12/2007 18:28
Hide
-0+

Interesting. Soon they'll unleash the 9 series on us and boost their popularity again. All this feels like the build up to it.

kentuckyranger 22/01/2008 15:50
Hide
-0+

You want to talk about rendering, just get the 8800GTX or Ultra, download the Human Head program and pick up your Jaw after it drops in aw, LOL!
Download here: http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_ [...] loads.html

kentuckyranger 22/01/2008 15:51
Hide
-0+

P.S. I've heard you can run this program on the 8600 Cards as well but the F/R's aren't as good as the 8800 series.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK