Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Adobe Strikes Back With 'We Heart Apple' Ad

by - source: Tom's Hardware UK

"We love you, we just don't want our friends to get the wrong idea about you."

The war between Adobe and Apple was starting to calm down. Though it's unlikely either side was ready to make up, it had been a few days since we'd heard anything from either side. However, that was probably more because Adobe was busy loading the canons with a new ad campaign and not because it was tired of the extremely public feud.

Yesterday, Adobe launched a new, passive aggressive ad campaign that takes a shot at Apple while remaining nice as pie. "Who us? We're just concerned about the users here, ma'am."

Along with these, Adobe's co-founders, Chuck Geschke and John Warnock, published an open letter detailing the company's thoughts on open markets. It's all pretty predictable stuff about not blocking innovation by fragmenting the Web into closed systems.

"Freedom of choice on the web has unleashed an explosion of content and transformed how we work, learn, communicate, and, ultimately, express ourselves," the letter reads. "We believe that consumers should be able to freely access their favorite content and applications, regardless of what computer they have, what browser they like, or what device suits their needs. No company — no matter how big or how creative — should dictate what you can create, how you create it, or what you can experience on the web."

Towards the end of the letter, Geschke and Warnock mention Apple specifically:

"We believe that Apple, by taking the opposite approach, has taken a step that could undermine this next chapter of the web — the chapter in which mobile devices outnumber computers, any individualcan be a publisher, and content is accessed anywhere and at any time."

Full letter is pasted below for those interested in reading the full, unabridged version.

The genius of the Internet is its almost infinite openness to innovation. New hardware. New software. New applications. New ideas. They all get their chance.

As the founders of Adobe, we believe open markets are in the best interest of developers, content owners, and consumers. Freedom of choice on the web has unleashed an explosion of content and transformed how we work, learn, communicate, and, ultimately, express ourselves.

If the web fragments into closed systems, if companies put content and applications behind walls, some indeed may thrive — but their success will come at the expense of the very creativity and innovation that has made the Internet a revolutionary force.

We believe that consumers should be able to freely access their favorite content and applications, regardless of what computer they have, what browser they like, or what device suits their needs. No company — no matter how big or how creative — should dictate what you can create, how you create it, or what you can experience on the web.

When markets are open, anyone with a great idea has a chance to drive innovation and find new customers. Adobe's business philosophy is based on a premise that, in an open market, the best products will win in the end — and the best way to compete is to create the best technology and innovate faster than your competitors.

That, certainly, was what we learned as we launched PostScript® and PDF, two early and powerful software solutions that work across platforms. We openly published the specifications for both, thus inviting both use and competition. In the early days, PostScript attracted 72 clone makers, but we held onto our market leadership by out-innovating the pack. More recently, we've done the same thing with Adobe® Flash® technology. We publish the specifications for Flash — meaning anyone can make their own Flash player. Yet, Adobe Flash technology remains the market leader because of the constant creativity and technical innovation of our employees.

We believe that Apple, by taking the opposite approach, has taken a step that could undermine this next chapter of the web — the chapter in which mobile devices outnumber computers, any individual can be a publisher, and content is accessed anywhere and at any time.

In the end, we believe the question is really this: Who controls the World Wide Web? And we believe the answer is: nobody — and everybody, but certainly not a single company.

Chuck Geschke, John Warnock
Cofounders
Chairmen, Adobe Board of Directors

Share:
12
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
Soulmachiklamo 14/05/2010 21:17
Hide
-3+

Ironic, I h(e)a(r)tE apple :)
Every company has a rival ...

mi1ez 14/05/2010 23:36
Hide
-0+

What a mess. Children

Alatheia00 15/05/2010 01:33
Hide
-0+

Anybody who buys into the whole crapple lifestyle, deserves everything they subscribed for. What could Adobe wish to achieve with this "open letter", I wish they would just hurry up and sort out flash 64 bti for windows 7.

bv90andy 15/05/2010 09:27
Hide
--1+

If adobe want its flash platform to survive HTML5 they need to put more people to work Iphone has been around for ages, in internet time, and they should have made a good version of flash for that to give to apple before the first iphone launch.

jkay69 15/05/2010 09:56
Hide
-0+

@bv90andy

The thing about iPhone is that Apple DON'T want Flash support! Apple prefer to control the content available to it's customers so that it can profit from every sale of every app, game, sound and video on the i platform. This is NOT a compatibility issue, it's a control issue.

What Adobe are trying to say is that Apple are being anti-competitive and creating a closed market on their devices and could very well topple Adobe's dominance in web content creation software. I believe that over 70% of web pages have Flash content but if devices deliberately shun Flash in favour of something else then content will be created using non-Flash software, essentially putting Adobe's future at risk.

I personally don't see either side as being 'Right' in this issue. Adobe are striving for 100% acceptance of Flash which would ultimately be a bad thing, but Apple are milking it's customers and content creators so they are at fault too...

So much for a free market :-) LMAO!!!

Alatheia00 15/05/2010 11:30
Hide
-0+

@jkay69

I think your right with regards to Apples decision to shun flash, as being a control issue. In comparative tests from other websites flash 10.1 on a nexus one device outperforms an iphone 3gs with html 5.1 by a huge margin, so this isn't about giving the customer the best deal this is apple trying to gain an important foothold in a market which is essential and integral to its growth lets face it performance isn't usually the primary concern of the Apple fanboy, they would probably purchase a polished turd if it had the Apple insignia on it.

jkay69 15/05/2010 18:23
Hide
-0+

@alatheia00

Very well put. And as long as Apple customers are willing to shell out top Dollar for inferior 'Shiny' products and services Apple stand a good chance of making a serious amount of money.

I know about 20 people and counting with iPhones and they worship them, you can't say a bad thing about them or they become seriously defensive and hurt, it's a phone for christs sake!!! Not a very good one if you consider how many lost calls they have had!!!

drapple 16/05/2010 03:36
Hide
-0+

I love my iPhone 3 and was eagerly awaiting the release of the new model this year but after all this flash crap I am considering buying an Android based phone instead.

SevenVirtues 16/05/2010 14:34
Hide
-0+

All this boils to one thing. The ONLY reason iPhones are doing so well is the app store.

If iPhones could run flash then no one would need the appstore as everything could be made free with flash.

Alatheia00 17/05/2010 01:50
Hide
-0+

@SevenVirtues,

I admire the creative side to Apple and its product asthetics, but I don't agree with the lack of freedom you have with content providers and configurability.

In the past I have been tempted to throw all my bleeding edge pc hardware into a modded G5 case purely because it just looks sexy as hell, even the iphone and ipad have a very distinct look and this brand image is what people are really paying for. The future for Apple lies with product diversification and offering more than just bling.

I saw a mobile on a tech site with the Intel Moorestown cpu and this thing would seriously defecate on the iphone, the features were beyond belief processing power and low tdp with crazy battery life, this is the future of the smartphone and when a similiar product launches here in the UK I will be first in line even if it doesn't come with an Apple logo.

das_stig 17/05/2010 18:12
Hide
-0+

The sooner Apple get their wrists slap for anti-competitive and monopolistic behaviour, the better for everybody.

Apple should be broken up into two separate hardware/software companies, along with a few others, or maybe, have the balls to open-source OSX.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK