Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No

Google, Eric Schmidt Convicted of Defamation Because of 'Suggestions' in Search

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

Google and company CEO Eric Schmidt have been convicted of defamation in France.

If you're a Google user, you are more than likely familiar with the company's Suggest feature, which shows you a list of possible searches related to the keywords you've entered into the search bar. Though it seems obvious that this feature is automated and operates by displaying the most common searches related to what you've searched for, a French court has convicted Google of defamation after a user complained that his name had been associated with the terms 'rapist' and 'Satanist'.

The Telegraph reports that the user, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was convicted of "corruption of a minor" and sentenced to three years in jail earlier this year. The man appealed the court's decision but discovered that Google Suggest had linked his name to undesirable terms, including 'rapist' and 'Satanist'. French law dictates that a person is innocent until all appeals have been exhausted.

As a result Google has been ordered to pay symbolic damages of one euro plus €5,000 in legal fees after the Superior Court of Paris found the search giant guilty of "public slandering of a private individual." Google has said it will appeal the court's decision, which also stated that the Mountain View company must take preventative measures to ensure the same thing does not happen again, and remove "harmful" suggestions.

A Google spokesperson clarified that these suggestions are not from Google but based on searches performed by other users.

"These searches are algorithmically determined based on a number of purely objective factors including (the) popularity of search terms," she told the Telegraph. "Google does not suggest these terms. All of the queries shown in Autocomplete have been typed previously by other Google users."

Source: The Telegraph

Share:
4
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
proletarian 28/09/2010 12:20
Hide
-4+

the judge who ruled against Google needs some basic computing lessons. seriously.

mi1ez 28/09/2010 09:25
Hide
-1+

This is pretty stupid. Maybe they should try to convict everyone who searched for "[name] rapist" or "[name] satanist", after all it's their fault it came up!

Anonymous 30/09/2010 13:29
Hide
-0+

Google aggregates individual 'slanders' and presents it to the people, unsolicited. That is publishing and is subject to court proceedings.

Best offers

Newsletters


OK