Benchmarks – World in Conflict Test 1

Ad

World in Conflict has thus far presented itself in three steps, namely a Beta Client, a Demo and now, the final retail version. The game is a representative of the RTS genre with extreme graphics effects set in an alternate timeline where WWIII broke out in the late 1980s.

While both the beta client and the demo were plagued by compatibility problems, the final version is thankfully a lot more polished. Previously, changing the resolution or graphics quality would often either freeze or crash the game. As a workaround, gamers were usually instructed to install the most recent beta graphics drivers. This is no longer necessary, as the official releases now run the game faultlessly. However, the Radeon HD 2400 XT and 2600 Pro and 2600 XT cards with 256 MB of video memory can still run into an occasional problem. Although the benchmarks run fine, the game crashes sometimes when the graphics quality setting is changed, even though the new settings are accepted. Note: Our 2400 XT and 2600 XT boards are early samples we received directly from ATI. If you continue to experience problems, delete the game directory in your Documents folder. (Don’t forget to make a backup of your saved games, though!)

World in Conflict is a very demanding game. With the graphics quality set to High, you’ll need at least a Radeon 2600 or a Geforce 8600 with 512 MB of video memory. If your card has less RAM, you’re either limited to the Medium setting, or the game will start in DirectX 9 mode the next time it is launched.

Tom’s Hardware divided this benchmark into two sub-tests. The first one draws on the official benchmark feature integrated in the game, which consists of several sequences and then displays a result. The most extreme effect, a huge explosion, reduces even the fastest cards in this group to a stutter (12 to 18 fps).

Only the Geforce 8800 GTX and Ultra are able to run World in Conflict smoothly. While additional video memory has little impact on ATI cards, having twice the RAM results in double the frame rate on Nvidia’s cards at higher resolutions. Enabling anti-aliasing on the 2900 XT cuts its performance in half. The Geforce 8800 GTS suffers from a performance drop starting at 1280 x 1024.


Talkback
dobby 08/10/2007 06:59
Hide
-0+
dobby

totally surpised witht the 2400 & 2600 results, seems as if the only real gaming GPU from ATI is the 2900 which is not wroth getting

dev1se 08/10/2007 10:51
Hide
-0+
dev1se

Gutted about these results really. My HD2900 Pro's arriving tomorrow and I really wish I'd of seen this before making that order. As I'd of gone with the 320MB 8800GTS.

But.... in ATi's favour, Ive just gone from a HD2600XT DDR4 rig in Crossfire... and that BLEW GAMES AWAY at max settings at 1680x1050 resolution... OK a few games didnt perform over 25fps... but if that crossfire setup was anything to go by, 2 X HD2900 Pros in Crossfire might be a very good and cheap alternative to the 8800GTX. Just a thought anyway
3DMARK06 Scores with 2 X HD2600XT 256MB DDR4 on 5000+ X2 CPU = 9742... My friends 8800GTX on 2.13ghz C2D Scored 10700.

leexgx 09/10/2007 12:59
Hide
-0+
leexgx

if your going to get sli crossfire better going for fast single card (8800gts 640mb or even GTX before considering SLI)

dev1se 09/10/2007 02:26
Hide
-0+
dev1se

Well luckily I managed to make back £220 on the sale of both of my HD2600XT's (some people pay anything!), which has paid for my HD2900 PRO and left me with £45 left over. I need to hurry up and buy my next HD2900 PRO before stocks run out. I think for £350 in total they'll do a good job. Two GPU's surely has the edge over one!

tstebbens 09/10/2007 04:21
Hide
-0+
tstebbens

Soooo glad I got an 8800GTS 320MB. It overclocks superbly: 500MHz core to 719MHz and 1600MHz DDR memory up to 1850MHz. Gives a standard 8800GTX a good run for it's money.

tstebbens 09/10/2007 04:41
Hide
-0+
tstebbens

Just had a closer look at some of the screenshots. No FSAA sucks. Damn that PS3!

tstebbens 09/10/2007 04:41
Hide
-0+
tstebbens

Just had a closer look at some of the screenshots. No FSAA sucks. Damn that PS3!

GodClassy 15/10/2007 01:53
Hide
-0+
GodClassy

I think it would be worth while re-doing the test wit the new Catalyst Driver 7.10. They made a big difference with Battlefield 2142 and now I can play Bioshock as it just crashed my system before. I am using an HD2600 Pro AGP and finally feel I got what I paid for (cheap)!!

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads