Categories:

Bioshock's DRM: Evolutionary? : Introduction

08:00 - Tuesday 11 September 2007 by Marc McEntegart
Source: Tom's hardware UK – Keywords: DRM, Bioshock
Categories: Gaming

Introduction

Ad

The tug-of-war that is software pirates versus publishers had been relatively quiet in the months leading up to the release of Bioshock, the much anticipated action-RPG that has, since birth, been called “the spiritual successor to System Shock 2”, the game in which – ironically enough given the present day predicament – a computer goes a bit bonkers and starts screwing everybody’s lives up.

We’ve seen it all over the years, from games asking you to quote random verses of the manual through to Bioshock’s rather iTunes-like method of protecting itself from thieves: When the game finally makes it home safe you’re not allowed install it on more than two computers and each machine is limited to three reinstalls, forever.

The publishers, 2K Games, didn’t do much for themselves when their tech support bounced gamers from rep to rep to rep seemingly with no real idea what they were going to do to rectify the problem. Eventually 2K got themselves organised and devised a 5 by 5 plan. They upped the number of machine installs to five and the number for reinstalls on each PC from three to five. Better, probably adequate for most peoples needs… But still, when you’ve plonked down your not insubstantial amount of money for the game, it’s no fun to have to scratch a notch in the box with each install.

Gamers have been bemoaning this limitation and draconian style of copy protection quite loudly, but as with all arguments there are two sides. On the one hand, you pay for your game and you shouldn’t be persecuted as if you were a pirate. On the other hand, publishers invest significant amounts of money into video games, and the margins involved are not all that astronomically high. Let’s not kid ourselves here – every day, thousands of titles are downloaded, and while you can argue to high heaven how many downloads actually equals a lost sale for publishers, you can’t tell me that 100,000 downloads of a game isn’t a few pennies lost for companies like 2K.

It’s the Catch-22 of gaming: If I pay for a game I don’t want copy protection, yet if there is no copy protection then it will be easier for the game to be pirated in the short term (and game publishers make their money in the first few months; no copy protection lasts forever, but long enough to break even is long enough.)

When the Bioshock issue came to light, 2K was relatively quick to relent and change to its 5 by 5 solution. They’ve seen what can happen when Joe Gamer becomes unhappy with the DRM setup: This has happened before. A cynical person might say that 2K deliberately left Bioshock’s DRM system very, very tight so that when they “loosened” it to a tight system, we’d think that 5 by 5 is a much better proposition.


Talkback

Badger1977 12/09/2007 02:59
Hide
-0+
Badger1977
This sucks ass. I pay for all my games and I expect to be able to install them and uninstall them at will. In fact I routenly re-install old games just if there is nothing new out at the time and im bord. If it gets to the stage where I cant re-install BioShock then I will be demanding a full refund and If the refuse I will boycot all there games from then on no matter how much I want to play them. I suggest you all do the same (I did this with THQ games cos they pissed me off). Infact if more PC game titles insist on attacking the legit users of their software I will say F**k you all and get a console; which would be a shame as i have been a PC gamer all my life (incase anyone is interested im now 30)
c2k8 12/09/2007 03:35
Hide
-0+
c2k8
I recently bought Dreamfall: The longest journey
I installed it on Vista OK but Starforce would not
activate even with the latest vista driver, so in the end i got a no cd crack to play the game, so I pay for a game and still end up cracking it anyway
spuddyt 12/09/2007 05:15
Hide
-0+
spuddyt
there is a cracked version out now... why don't they patch the game and remove the DRM?
Therlian 12/09/2007 07:10
Hide
-0+
Therlian
I agree with Badger1977. I too bought BioShock when it released for the PC, however it would only play approx 15% of the time. Most attempts at launching the game would fail with a SecureRom error telling me to insert the original disc, even though I did have the original disc in the drive. Also, if I want to uninstall and reinstall a game I own, or install it on different computers, I should have that right as long as the computer is owned by me and in my possession. PC copy protection is getting way out of hand, and I have started purchasing less and less PC games because of it. I even took my copy of BioShock back and the store I bought it from was nice enough to exchange it for the Xbox 360 version because they considered my PC version defective. I have already boycotted Sierra games because I paid for FEAR, and it will not run at all anymore on my PC, because of it's copy protection; I even uninstalled all of my programs that have virtual drives and it still wouldn't work. One of the few companies left that I have no problems with their PC games is EA. I own every Need for Speed game and I've never had an issue with backing them up. Yes, I paid retail price for every copy I have. Also, backing up discs are important; I have had my share of CDs gone bad or get broken.
leexgx 14/09/2007 04:32
Hide
-0+
leexgx
SecureRom V6 or newer is Hurting the sales of games now

you should not have to no-CD the game in the first place

in all most likey these games Will not work on the next windows to come out as it think windows is an virtual disk drive or some lame error msg

i not buying Bio shock for just the resone that thay did this to the game, thay should say now before you buy this game it has SecureRom on it so it mite not work or you mite have to Format your PC before you can play it and then you can only install it 3 times before you ned to buy an other one
mactronix 19/09/2007 11:51
Hide
-0+
mactronix
I can understand why the companies do this sort of thing they are only trying to protect their investments and i don't pretend to know what the answer is but this isn't it they will drive the honest joes (the ones of us who are left if you believe the companies every one is doing it already)in to the arms of the pirates.
Do they seriously think for one minute that there wont be cracks and patches to work around these kind of draconian measures pretty quickly.
I know a lot of people who use no cd patches routinely just to protect the original.
But i have to wonder if people will get disenchanted and just download the pre cracked /patched copy and be done with it.

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.



Google Ads