IBM Teams Up With ARM for 14-nm Processing
IBM and ARM have extended their partnership to develop chips using 14-nm processing technology.
Monday IBM announced a partnership with UK chip developer ARM to develop 14-nm chip processing technology. The news confirms the continuation of an alliance between both parties that launched back in 2008 with an overall goal to refine SoC density, routability, manufacturability, power consumption and performance.
For the uninitiated, the idea is to build smaller, faster chip designs that provide better power management, resulting in longer battery life and better multimedia support than the current crop of ARM-based chips. With the help of ARM's design team, IBM will take ARM's intellectual property (IP) and cram it into IBM's miniscule manufacturing processes.
"ARM’s Cortex processors have become the leadership platform for the majority of smart phones and many other emerging mobile devices," said Michael Cadigan, general manager, IBM Microelectronics. "We plan to continue working closely with ARM and our foundry customers to speed the momentum of ARM technology by delivering highly advanced, low-power semiconductor technology for a variety of new communications and computing devices."
Through the previous ARM/IBM collaboration on the 32-nm and 28-nm, ARM has already delivered eleven test chips that provide concrete research structures and early silicon validation. However, using a 14-nm manufacturing process is quite a drop when compared to ARM's current crop of Cortex processors used in Nvidia's Tegra 2 and Samsung's Hummingbird chips, both of which are using 45-nm technology.
"IBM has a proven track record of delivering the core research and development that is relied upon by major semiconductor vendors worldwide for their advanced semiconductor devices. Their leadership of the ISDA alliance, which features a diverse set of top-tier companies as members, is growing in importance as consolidation trends in the semiconductor manufacturing industry continue," said Simon Segars, EVP and general manager, ARM physical IP division. "This agreement will ensure we are able to deliver highly tuned ARM Artisan Physical IP solutions on advanced ISDA process technologies to meet the early time-to-market our customers demand."
With the 32-nm and 28-nm samples currently out in the field for testing, it's uncertain when we'll see the first samples of the 14-nm process in action. Both ARM and Intel did not offer a projected "availability" date, so stay tuned.
- Cortex-9 ,
- 14-nm ,
- ARM ,
- Tegra ,
- Hummingbird-CPU
- World of StarCraft Modder Gets Job Offer
- Apple: Win Tabs 'Heavy,' Android Tabs 'Bizarre'
- AMD Releasing Radeon HD 6950 1GB for $279?
- Windows 8 Surfaces in NDA Presentation
- Acer: No, We're Not Leaving the Netbook Market
- AMD Launches APU for Embeded Systems
- This is HP's 10-inch WebOS Tablet, the Topaz
- Acer to Replace Netbooks with Sandy Bridge Tabs
- Crytek: FPS Games Need Multiplayer to Succeed
- MSFT Launches Web Reality Show About IT Pros
- Apple's Giving its Customers a New Kind of Screw
- Nvidia Revealing Tegra 3 at MWC Next Month?
- Duke Nukem Forever Date Confirmed for May
- Bethesda Says RAGE Demo Unlikely
- Antec Debuts Its First Liquid Cooling System
- Hot Hammerhead Case Mod Costs $2,900
- Google Copied Even More From Oracle for Android
- What It's Like Watching a Computer Illiterate





"Both ARM and Intel did not offer a projected "availability" date, so stay tuned."

And then, out of nowhere, Intel shows up.
I'm getting confused now, what happened to 22nm?
I'm getting confused now, what happened to 22nm?
It's still around somewhere. We are seeing it more and more in memory solutions.
I wonder how small they can get these transistors? It's crazy!
It's still around somewhere. We are seeing it more and more in memory solutions.I wonder how small they can get these transistors? It's crazy!
Most computer scientists currently assume 11nm to be the practical bottom limit for traditional semiconductors. Even at 11nm, the amount of gaps becomes enormous and things like quantum tunneling start to become a problem.
After that, we will have to move to nanotransistors, most likely based on carbon. But we are miles away from that stage. We lack both a suitable material for the transistor (graphene is often cited, but cannot yet be mass manufactured and has certain issues) and a way to manufacture transistors at such low scales.
To put the challenge in perspective, the ITRS assumes that we will reach 11nm by 2022 in ideal circumstances (Intel is optimistic and believes 2015 to be within reach, but that might be marketing spin).
Personally, I think we'll be stuck at 16nm for a long time - after all, that's the shortest hassle free length available to us with current technology.