How fast and for how much.
Today's the big debut for Intel's Lynnfield processors. To learn all about what's so great about these new chips, check out our full coverage. All the reading, thanks to the hard work of our Managing Editor Chris Angelini, should keep you occupied for some time.
For a quick summary, however, of what's new today, clock speeds, cache sizes, cores and how much they'll cost, peep the table below:
Check out the following guides and reviews to Intel's new chip below. All three articles were published today!
Intel Core i5 And Core i7: Intel’s Mainstream Magnum Opus
Core i5, Core i7, CrossFire, And SLI: Gaming Paradise, Redux?
In Theory: How Does Lynnfield's On-Die PCI Express Affect Gaming?
Sponsored
Is it just me or is Intel shooting themselves in the foot? People that use applications that take advantage of multithreading like 3ds max are going to choose one of the new line of core i7 processors compared to its older equivalent and only having to pay a very small difference in price.
How much extra silicon real estate does HT take up? The TDP is within the same characteristic as the HT-enabled parts..and as mentioned, multi-threading apps - which are now becoming ever-more common - would benefit especially compared to AMD.
In terms of cost I would personally choose Phenom II, but naturally this choice varies depending on the particular sector and applications used. I do think it's a poor show to disable Hyper-Threading considering this is a) a new processor design, and b) that applications are increasingly demanding more thread-optimised hardware. Core 2 users would probably be looking at this chip and wondering what the bother is especially when they can just crank up the FSB and throw in a better graphics card for their games..
I think its best to actually do the research first, and compare a few benchmarks. The processors listed here are not flagship models compared to what is already available. I already listed the flagship processors from Intel. As for what the ‘X’ stands for, the processors listed here with the alpha prefix of ‘x’ are xeon processors and the ‘X’ marks it as a performance processor, where as the ‘L’ marks it as power optimised. You are getting confused with desktop processors where ‘X’ means dual core extreme, and ‘QX’ meaning quad-core extreme. The meaning of Intel processor alpha prefixes and number allocations can be found here: -
http://www.intel.com/products/processor_number/about/xeon_itanium.htm
I do think that - as mentioned - Intel may just shoot itself in the foot with this particular version. I'd find it very hard to justify such a purchase in view of the overheads associated with a new motherboard and new memory. Can Intel afford to be this selective? Time will tell, I guess.
Thanks for you input all the same
“The i"x" is a flagship product when it's compared to what's available: Core 2 Quad’ ?????
Compared to what’s available??? ……….. Core 2 Quad ????
I think Wild9 has been trapped in a time bubble for the last year or at least a very deep hole. Intel’s core i7 processors have been available since November 2008! These new additions to the core i5/7 family make really great value especially when you look at the prices of lga 1156 motherboards, plus future upgrade plans for the lga1156 socket.
Some info for wild9.
The year is 2009 and nearing 2010!
Tony Blair is no longer prime minister of the UK.
Computers no longer require glass valves .
and mobile phones no longer require a 5kg battery and carrying handle.
I’m glad you got rescued but time to catch up on a few things
It almost seems like your reading a completely different article to the rest of us!