Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: CPU-Coolers, Phenom, Core2
Categories: Hardware
Zalman Reserator XT (Cont'd.)
Although fan speed can be adjusted manually, the default setting has the cooler running in Auto mode. This is also the mode the cooler automatically reverts to as soon as it is turned off. In other words, it is impossible to save a fan speed setting. Using a button, the backlighting of the display and the flow control on the cooler’s faceplate can be turned off.
Zalman’s cooler does not have any way of reporting the fan speed or the water flow rate to the motherboard for monitoring. Should the cooler fail for any reason, it will alarm the user to this fact by beeping. The PC, on the other hand, can only recognize the failure indirectly through the rising CPU temperatures.
We tested cooling performance with the cooler set to its standard Auto mode as well as at its maximum fan speed, which we set manually. Despite its larger size, the Reserator XT can’t quite measure up to the MSI/Hydrogen solution even at its highest fan setting. At 45 db(A) the noise level is far too high for a water-cooling solution as well.
However, in Auto mode, the CPU temperature is only marginally higher, and the Reserator actually offers cooling performance similar to that of the MSI/Hydrogen bundle. As an added bonus, the noise level is not at all bothersome in this mode either. As with any other water cooling solution, you’ll need to ensure that the chipset and the CPU’s voltage regulation modules are sufficiently cooled in some manner, as there is obviously no airflow from the CPU cooler.
We don’t recommend using the Reserator XT at the highest fan speed, since the noise level increases disproportionately while cooling is only marginally improved compared to auto mode. At €350, it also costs much more than any of its predecessors. Considering its performance, the cooler is definitely too expensive, especially since Zalman didn’t even think to include any kind of hardware monitoring functionality. Our final score is based on the cooler’s Auto mode.


| CPU | 100% load | idle |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature Auto | 66 °C | 35 °C |
| Temperature High | 65 °C | 35 °C |
| Noise | 45.1 dB(A) | 37.7 dB(A) |
| Fan Speed | 2000 rpm | 1200 rpm |
| Weight | 220 grams | |
| Intel Socket | 775 | |
| AMD Socket | AM2 | AM2+ |
| 939 | 940 |
- Previous page Zalman Reserator XT - Heavy and...
- Next page Tom's Hardware Performance Results
- CPU Cooler Charts 2008, Part I - Loosing your Cool?
- Ultimate Budget Overclocking Box - A 3.5 GHz Core 2 System with a...
- Finding The World's Best Hardware Prices: Shop Globally
- Comparing Water Coolers: We Follow Your Lead
- Keeping Your CPU Going If Your Cooler Fails
- Cooler Master CM690 : The happy medium?
- How Cool Are Thermalright's Graphics Card Coolers?
- Extreme FSB: Taking the E6750 Beyond 4 GHz
- Radical CPU Coolers from CoolIT
- Computex 2007 Day 1: Coolers and Power Supplies




Nice to see the Noctua's still up there!
I'm hoping they'll review the Zalman CNPS9700 and the Tuniq Tower 120 in the part three of this series.
Any chance of including the standard Intel box cooler as a baseline comparison for temperature, noise and installation?
well just look at page 2 that basicly is an Intel cooler
How can the nexus (pg 2) get a 10 for installation as it is the push pin type that accounts for significant numbers of the 'are my temps ok?' posts on the forum, this method whilst simple in principle, i.e. no backplate, no water etc. it causes many problems upon actual real world installations.
it LOOKS a lot like the Intel HSF, but is it the same? I doubt it, but does anyone know? if not, i too would like to see the intel scores.
I'm using the Titan Amanda tec cooler, never gone over 45°C would've been nice to see that up there too.