Intel HDCP Cracked Using $350 Hardware Kit
An FPGA development board was used in a man-in-the-middle attack in obtaining and transmitting an encrypted signal from an HDMI port.
Researchers from the Ruhr University of Bochum's Secure Hardware Group in Germany have cracked the copy protection system used by HDMI ports: Intel's HDCP, or High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection. In addition to HDMI, HDCP is used to encrypt video signals transferred via DVI, DisplayPort and other connectors.
"In 2010, an HDCP master key, which is intended to form the secret core element of the encryption system, appeared briefly on a website," reads the official press release. "In response, the manufacturer Intel announced that HDCP still represented an effective protection component for digital entertainment, as the production of an HDCP-compatible chip using this master key would be highly complex and expensive."
Seemingly taking that as a challenge, the team accomplished the "inexpensive" man-in-the-middle attack by using Digilent's Atlys Spartan-6 FPGA development board. It features a Xilinx Spartan-6 LX45 FPGA (field programmable gate array) in a 324-pin BGA package, two HDMI video input ports, two HDMI video output ports, a 10/100/1000 Ethernet jack, a RS232 serial port and more.
"Our intention was rather to investigate the fundamental security of HDCP systems and to measure the actual financial outlay for a complete knockout," said team leader Prof. Dr.-Ing Tim Güneysu. "The fact that we were able to achieve this in the context of a PhD thesis and using materials costing just €200 is not a ringing endorsement of the security of the current HDCP system."
The $349 USD ($199 Academic price) board serves as the "middleman" by modifying all communications between a Blu-ray player and a flat-screen HDTV without being detected. The team was able to tap the HDCP encrypted data streams, decipher them and send the digital content to an unprotected screen via a corresponding HDMI 1.3-compatible receiver.
Yet as the team points out, this man-in-the-middle attack could allow the end-user to burn films from Blu-ray discs, but recording directly from an HDMI port results in a large amount of data. That said, this method is "of no great practical use for pirates." But Güneysu envisions a real threat to security-critical systems used by law enforcement agencies and the military.
"Although Intel is already offering a new security system, HDCP 2.0, due to the backward compatibility, the weak point will also remain a problem in coming years," he concluded.
Intel and Digilent have yet to comment on the report.
- Gigabyte Updates 3-in-1 Line with Booktop T1132
- MIT Researchers Invent Diode For Light in Optical Circuits
- Global HDD Supply 70 Million Units Short in Q4 2011
- Is Intel Going to Kill its Celeron Processor Brand?
- Best Buy UK Stores to Close January 15
- AMD Intros Branded Desktop Memory Modules
- The First Intel Ivy Bridge CPU Clock Speeds and More
- London Pub Installs Pee-controlled Video Games in Bathrooms
- IBM Files Patent for Putting Fire Extinguisher in a Computer
- ARM-Based Windows 8 Notebooks in Mid-2013?
- Sky Go Now Offering On-demand Movie Streaming
- Ubuntu May Be Coming to a TV Near You
- A Glass Touch Keyboard and Mouse is Near Reality
- 3DMark Benchmark Coming to Android in 2012
- VIDEO: Why Half-Life Doesn't Need Hollywood
- New Acer Display Converts 2D Images into 3D
- AMD: It Won't Be About 'AMD vs. Intel' Anymore
- Google: Galaxy Nexus Volume Bug Fix to Hit Next Week





I just setup a nas server with 6TB of storage with a AMD processor and loads of ram... Dumping that there and using the nas to recode it to a nice divx over night.. maybe its not pratical- but it sure is pretty easy.. but you have to watch the whole movie i suppose-- ripping the Bluray directly seems a bit faster.
this isn't new at all - see hdfury cables. They have been available for AGES and do the exact same thing..
Good to see tax euros being spent so effectively.
ive never understood hdcp
if you can play blu-rays on a computer it can copy them
we have all seen screen capture software before. its kind of a waste of time
(i know a screen capture wouldnt work, its an example)