Three High-End Gaming Systems Compared : Introduction
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: Blackbird, Falcon, Northwest, Vigor
Introduction
The idea that “time is money” often escapes all but the wealthiest of enthusiasts, and even a few bucks-up buyers would prefer the experience of building things themselves. But game time is worth far more than build time to the folks who buy fully-configured gaming systems. These results-oriented buyers typically place high value on their leisure time and have no problem paying someone with more experience to deliver an often higher-quality product with backing in the form of a warranty.
Boutique builders have catered to high-end buyers since the earliest days of PC whiteboxes, but only the most competitive survive. Among these are VoodooPC, Falcon Northwest and Vigor Gaming, which are responsible for the three systems in our lab today…almost.
VoodooPC was so successful that it couldn’t escape the lustful eyes of the big-box builders and was acquired by HP to be the jewel in an otherwise boring behemoth’s crown. The name lives on in original VoodooPC models along with “VoodooDNA” for high-end HP branded gaming systems. Both Voodoo-branded product lines use popular, high-end, industrial-standard architecture components of the highest quality.
Thus, our final line-up includes custom configurations of the HP Blackbird 002 LC, Falcon Northwest Mach 5, and Vigor Gaming Colossus.
| System | HP Blackbird 002 LC | Falcon Northwest Mach 5 | Vigor Gaming Colossus |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770 3.20 GHz, FSB-1600, 12 MB Cache Overclocked to 3.60 GHz, Stock FSB | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650 3.00 GHz, FSB-1333, 12 MB Cache Overclocked to 4.00 GHz, FSB-1776 | 2x Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 3.20 GHz, FSB-1600, 12 MB Cache Overclocked to 4.00 GHz, Stock FSB |
| CPU Cooler | Asetek LCLC with Dual 120 mm Fans | Asetek LCLC with Single 120 mm Fan | 2x Cooler Master Hyper 212 |
| Motherboard | EVGA nForce 790i Ultra SLI 790i Ultra SLI, BIOS P05 (05/16/2008) | Asus P5E3 Premium WiFi-AP Intel X48, BIOS 0505 (06/11/2008) | Intel Skulltrail D5400XS Intel 5400B, BIOS 0821 (01/22/2008) |
| RAM | 4x Corsair CM3X1G1600C8D4 4x 1024 MB, DDR3-1600, CL 8-8-8-24 Underclocked to DDR3-1333 9-9-9-24 | 4x Kingston KHX14400D3/1 G 4x 1024 MB, DDR3-1800, CL 8-8-8-24 Underclocked to DDR3-1333 6-6-6-15 | 4x Kingston KVR800D2D4F5/2 G 4x 2048 MB DDR2-800 ECC FB-DIMM Stock Clock, CL 5-5-5-18 |
| Graphics | 2x EVGA 01G-P3-1282-AR (SLI) Nvidia GTX-280 GPU (621MHz) 1024 MB GDDR3-2268 (Per Card) | 2x Radeon HD 4870 X2 (Crossfire) 2x ATI 4870 GPU (Per Card) 750 MHz 2x 1024MB GDDR5-3600 (Per Card) | 3x Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 (SLI) Nvidia GTX-280 GPU (650 MHz) 1024MB GDDR3-2300 (Per Card) |
| Hard Drives | Western Digital Raptor WD1600ADFS 160 GB, 10000 RPM, 16 MB Cache | 2x WD WD3000GLFS (RAID 0) 300 GB, 10000 RPM, 16 MB Cache | 2x WD Raptor WDC WD1500ADFD 150 GB, 10000 RPM, 16 MB Cache |
| Seagate Barracuda ST3750640AS 750GB, 7200 RPM, 16MB Cache | |||
| Sound | Integrated Realtek ALC888S Codec | Integrated ADI 1988B Codec | Integrated IDT STAC9274D Codec |
| Network | Integrated Gigabit Networking | Integrated Gigabit Networking | Integrated Gigabit Networking |
| Power | Topower 1100W Modularized | Silverstone SST-ST1200 Modularized | Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W |
| Optical | TSST DVD-R/RW TS-T632L 8x DVD±R/RW/DL, 8x DVD-RAM | LG GGW-H20L BD-RE/HDDVD-ROM 6x BD-R, 2x BD-RE, 16x DVD±R | Asus DRW-2014L1T DVD-RW 16x DVD±R, 8x+RW/DL, 14x DVD-RAM |
| LG GGW-H10N BD-RE/DVD 4x BD-R, 2x BD-RE, 8x DVD-R | |||
| Keyboard | Not Included (Optional) | Not Included (Optional) | Not Included (Optional) |
| Mouse | Not Included (Optional) | Not Included (Optional) | Not Included (Optional) |
| OS | Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit | Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit | Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit |
| Warranty | One Year | Three Years (One Year Overnight Ship) | Three Years |
| Support | One Year | Lifetime | Lifetime |
| Price | $5869 | $6097 | $8160 |
With Intel’s fastest processor and a few extra drives, the HP system appears, at first blush, to be a value leader among “Elite Gaming” systems before considering its short warranty period and differences in tuning. Vigor Gaming, on the other hand, offers eight cores for the ultimate in application performance, plus 3-way SLI at an appropriately high price. Falcon Northwest chose the CrossFireX alternative for its Mach 5 configuration, with four Radeon HD 4870 processors and the potential to speed right past the SLI configurations of its competitors. This should make for an interesting comparison.
Note that all three systems are built-to-order, so buyers who favor one system but would prefer a graphics configuration similar to another system should be able to find what they need from any of these companies. And with that disclaimer out of the way, we’re ready to take a closer look.
- Next page HP Blackbird 002 LC
- Gaming System Review: Überclok's Ion
- Why I Went Mac But Still Keep My PC
- iBuypower Gamer 942IL: Best of the Best?
- Quad SLI Vs. 3-Way SLI
- What to Buy, a Notebook or Desktop PC?
- Shuttle XPC Prima SX38P2 Pro
- Apple's 24'' iMac - All-in-One with OS Options
- More than meets the Eye - Barebone PC for Quad-Core and Crossfire
- Upgrade Modules – Remote Controls for Media Centers
- AMD’s DTX Form Factor – A new Concept for the HTPC
I think this review missed some very important points.
1- Why 2 way SLI win over 3 way SLI in the majority of gaming benchmarks ? Is skulltrail platform buggy ?
Where is this fact in the conclusion ?
2- Where is in the conclusion the price comparison ? I know this is not a "Value" over "Price" review but spending $2000 more and receive
a "more responsive" system is not the answer. If you want to game you you cand do triple SLI and not 8 cores.
On the other hand if you ant a workstation you want more cores or Quadro like video cards.
I think the Vigor Gaming Colossus a complete shoot in the foot.
By the way, why ultimate gaming mosters dont get dedicated soundcards ?
The conclusion decided nothing and was completely unhelpfull.
+1 for "The conclusion decided nothing and was completely unhelpfull"
Outside of more processor being better in multi-threaded apps (which we knew) and the 2x4870X2s in CFX beating the 3SLI GTX280 (which I'm not surprised at), I think the only conclusion that can be made, is that my "custom overclocked" Q6600 and HD4870 offer far greater value and plenty of performance, albeit without a warrantee.
To pay $8000 for a system and not get a dedicated sound card is really poor.
what i don't get is why not use 2x HD4870's on skulltrail? aren't they crossfire and sli compatible? wouldn't that be a heaps better option?
I remember when Tom's could be commendd most of all for the quality of their articles.
Not only do these results conflict with sources that I now consider more trustworthy, they're also poorly explained, analysed and presented.
Does anyone from Toms bother to read our posts by the way?
Topman: Ditto here.
blibba: No, and that's why they're still here. They DO monitor the US boards and those are quickly pruned of any non-1337sp34k criticism of Intel, nVidia or Toms. Funny that.
The last comment in the review states that they couldn't find a 4 GHZ product online...
I find reviews with equipment custom groomed like this to be pointless in regards to what a customer would really be getting!
If this is simply for the wow factor... then fine it makes the mark!
cool http://www.theidoctor.org
$8000 and you don't get a mouse n keyboard with it....hahaha.
The conclusion managed to say nothing in all those words. They state the results and end with, 'Pick your poison'. What? No analysis of the results or explanations of why the 3-way SLI tied with 2-way most of the time. Very much agree with the other posts here, especially Thorak's comment.
Aren't the 64-bit versions of Vista supposed to suck?
They support as much memory as you want but are buggy like Windows Me and often don't run 32-bit software that XP can run.
Can someone explain to me, why on the 32bit Crysis chart, some of the results were 0 on the higher resolutions? How come some systems would run that higher rez in 64bit, but not 32bit? Is it to do with the limits of the 32bit addresses?