Will BIOS Be Dead in 3 Years?
MSI will begin its shift over to UEFI by the end of the year, with the industry expected to follow over the next three years.
Is the end of BIOS almost upon us? That's the current speculation, with the date of termination expected in the near future. According to an unnamed spokesperson for MSI, the motherboard manufacturer is making the shift over to point and click universal extensible firmware interface (UEFI) systems by Q4 2010/Q1 2011. The change is expected to become "widely adopted" within three years thereafter.
The MSI spokesperson said that the first new products using UEFI will be based on Intel's Sandy Bridge chipset, and will range from entry-level motherboards to high-end solutions. This should be expected, as UEFI is a continuation of Intel's original EFI project designed to replace the clunky, elderly BIOS interface, and to address other problems that have plagued PCs for years, including hard drive storage limits beyond 2 TB.
But upgrading to UEFI isn't as simple as flashing the old BIOS with the new interface. "A UEFI system is generally bigger than a traditional BIOS," the spokesperson said, "and most of the on-board ROM is not that big, so you can’t just flash UEFI into a traditional BIOS board."
Motherboard manufacturers are also holding off on the new technology because of the resources needed to make the change. There's also a customization issue: UEFI doesn't support every board. Manufacturers who design unique features and technologies for their products--those that only communicate with BIOS--may not function with UEFI installed. Designs will eventually need to be re-worked to incorporate the new interface.
But MSI believes that UEFI is the way to go, the next evolutionary step even though UEFI still needs some work. The company may be right, especially as consumers require more and more storage space than what BIOS can currently handle.
- Alienware's M11x Gets Core CPUs and Optimus
- Pro PC Gamers Have Elderly Chain-Smoker Bodies
- Foxconn Workers Getting Another Raise Up to 66%
- CoolIT Demonstrates Maestro Wireless Fan Control
- Dungeon Siege III Announced, Screens
- Red Faction Armageddon in 2011, Screens
- Day 1: FEAR 3 Scariest Game Of All Time
- How Not to Announce New iPhone Data Plans
- Windows 7 SP1 Beta Coming Soon
- Google Gives HP Printers Own Email Addresses
- Educational Math-Based FPS Ignites Protest
- iPhone 4: Who Needs the iPad Now?
- Boy Saves Sister From Moose Using WoW Skills
- We May Know Valve's Big Super Secret
- Google Update Promises 50% Fresher Results
- DRM: Is Steamworks The Way to Go?
- VOTW: Calling Tech Support Over Google Pacman
- Massive AT&T Breach Exposes A-Listers' iPad Data





I don't understand. I thought it was the operating system that was the limiting factor on hard drive sizes. For isntance XP could only access 2.1TB (Or something similar) whereas win7 could take full advantage of a 3TB drive.
Or is this more for around 5TB drives or something?
Beside that, what other features can it bring to the table, besides a snazzy, yet unrequired GUI?
I believe it was being able to boot off a 2TB+ partition, otherwise it was OS based but as soon as you want to boot off it the BIOS requires a 2TB or less partition or Hard disk.
^ evilgenius is right, it's to do with what the BIOS can access before the OS boots.
Will UEFI bring the ability to boot from PCIe?
I'm sure the boot/disk size issues with a standard BIOS could be solved without resorting to replacing it with what is, in essence, a mini OS.
Yet more bloatware coming to a PC near you!
Will it play crysis though?
Would have been nice to properly credit the source:
http://www.thinq.co.uk/2010/6/8/ex [...] ree-years/
Bad form chaps.
is it section 508 complient?
This is stupid. It will just take longer to load because it's bigger, be more sluggish, increase boot speed, and make it easier for viruses to be installed on the increased size-ROM
will this be supported by AMD if it is intels idea?
I think Macs use EFI they seem to boot much faster than most comparable PC.
will this be supported by AMD if it is intels idea?
I believe since the EFI supports both x86 and x86-64 instruction sets rather than Intel CPUs it will be every modern CPU
Bios dead?. I would swear that I already heard it five years ago ...
Long live the good old BIOSes.
They served us, right from the advent of modern pc, uptil now folks.
I'm sure the boot/disk size issues with a standard BIOS could be solved without resorting to replacing it with what is, in essence, a mini OS.Yet more bloatware coming to a PC near you!
You have no idea.
Replacing the ancient BIOS with a new system is far more than disk/boot space. It'll bring new efficiencies and improvements, shortcuts and support for more modern tech right out of the box.
As for bloat; You don't get that either. You don't even see the amount of space in your BIOS, unless you actually look it up. It's not going to affect you at all.
PCs have advanced a lot since BIOS.