Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: Vista, Capable, Microsoft Category : Desktops
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has refused to hear Microsoft’s appeal against a ruling that a lawsuit accusing the company of misleading consumers with its “Vista Capable” marketing campaign in 2006 can have Class Action status.
The original ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Marsha Pechman in February said that the year-old lawsuit can have Class Action, meaning that potentially thousands of people can bring forward the claim that Microsoft misled them about the suitability of certain computers to run Windows Vista. The lawsuit centres around allegations that the “Vista Capable” stickers on machines does not actually ensure that a machine is capable of running more than Vista Basic, the entry-level version of the operating system that does not come with many of its more advanced features, such as Aero.
This lawsuit was halted when Microsoft brought its appeal to the Ninth Circuit appeals court, but it can now go ahead with lawyers continuing the process of discovery. Already hundreds of emails have been obtained by lawyers representing the individuals suing Microsoft that purport to show that Microsoft officials lowered the bar for Vista Capable machines so as to allow Intel to sell more hardware.
The emails also reveal that companies such as Dell and HP warned Microsoft that lowering the bar for Vista Capable stickers could lead to a great deal of confusion amongst consumers. In total 29 companies have been subpoenaed for more documents to do with the case.
"Plaintiffs are pleased that the Ninth Circuit has denied Microsoft’s petition for permission to appeal Judge Pechman’s class certification order," said Jeff Thomas, an attorney representing one of the original plaintiffs. "We look forward to the setting of a new trial date and proceeding with discovery."
Microsoft meanwhile was sounding cheery, with spokesman Jack Evan saying "The Ninth Circuit’s decision not to accept our request for interim review is not a ruling on the merits of our case. We look forward to presenting all of the facts on what the district court itself said is a novel claim."
Win or lose the case, this is yet another embarrassment for Microsoft in what has, ultimately, been a great disappointment. Windows Vista has well and truly bombed in many senses of the term.
-
Previous News Article
Apple To Build A PA Semi iPhone? Not... -
Next News Article
Leak: ATI Radeon 4800 Gets 480 Stream...
- Mac clone president slams Steve Jobs
- Update: Apple wants to get rid of third-party Mac maker
- Bill Gates says Vista successor possible next year
- Alienware's Area-51 desktop now includes the Intel QX9770 Core 2...
- Windows Vista prices slashed in the US
- Dell rolls out ESA gaming PC
- Windows Vista SP1 RTM available via MLVS
- Vista SP1 already leaked onto the net
- Yellow Dog Linux 6.0 released on PS3
- Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 in production
Yet more Microsoft bashing. I hope that all of these people who were too tight to buy a decent PC in the first place have to pay all the court costs when they lose.
i just hope M$ loses money - i dont like what they did here, even if it is legal
what everybody seems to forget about this argument is that we are talking about the average Joe, not the enthusiast/professionals that you get on toms.
Microsoft deserves to lose this for misleading the public, the avarage joe doesnt know what computers are good/bad, they simply follow the marketing, which in this case lead them a-stray.
i sometimes wonder how many people think they cant play games without an intel CPU im sick of walking through my local computer shop and being told that i cant game unless i have an intel core2. Yes these people are idiots but its not there fault its they are just repeating what they have been told by the large companies that they trust.
YEAH! they can play all their games on a Mac!!!
~david, don't be a b00b. Why should people spend more money for something if they are told it will suffice for what they need it for?
Why get a Quad Core for word processing? Why RAID your drives if you are only going to be watching pr0n? I am not for wonton M$ bashing, but they lowered the bar by saying that some machines were Vista Capable w/o saying they were, in the VERY least "Windows Vista BASIC compatable".
They should have just bit that bullet and made sure there was a difference between their certifications if they were going to lower the bar.