Origins (Continued)
Another forerunner, 3dfx, brought this concept to the mainstream market with its second generation of chips: the Voodoo 2 and its famous SLI (Scan Line Interleave). This chip allowed the most fortunate players to install a second accelerating card (on top of the standard video card, which could lead to taking up to 3 PCI slots for video alone) allowing double the fill rate as a whole. As the technical name suggests, the rendering is interlaced, meaning one card was rasterizing the even lines while the other took care of the odd ones. Some manufacturers like Quantum 3D, well known for having integrated two Voodoo chips on a single card, pushed the concept even further by basing them on 3dfx technology. After having integrated two Voodoo 2 chips on a single card, they linked four of them together.
It’s on this monster that 3dfx held the T-Buffer demonstration.
With the arrival of AGP, multi card solutions became impossible and manufacturers went for the integration of many chips on the same card with varying degrees of success. Among those endeavors was the ATI Rage Fury MAXX, which really doesn’t stand out. We’d far rather keep the Voodoo 5 5500 as a souvenir of that time, but a souvenir sadly tinged with regret, as it was the last high end graphic card from 3dfx, the 6000 version was really a Quantum 3D. After that, multi GPU solutions deserted our PCs for a while without totally disappearing as they found their place in other segments. The professional segment first and foremost, with cards like Evans&Sutherland using many R300s. Silicon Graphics itself finally resolved not to develop its own chip and used ATI’s.
Multi chip solutions have also been used in the arcade segment and we can cite the example of the Naomi 2 from Sega, which exploited two PowerVR2 that were fed with an Elan geometric processor. Then they came back stronger than ever on our PCs with the Volari V8 Duo… oops sorry… the 3DLabs Realizm 800, even if this card was clearly destined to the professional market. Finally, we remember the GeForce 7950GX2, which left us with mixed feelings in the end.
History keeps on repeating itself, now it’s AMD’s turn to launch its multi GPU card, aiming to fill the hole in its high end range after the fallout left by the Radeon HD 2900 XT, following the performance-price ratio of the HD 3870. Among other things, the manufacturer faces a real problem, not owning a high-end chip and after announcing the postponement of its R700 until… 2009! Even if there’s still a small chance we’ll see a hypothetical R690 this year, it’s possible, when considering the recent situation of the manufacturer, that it will just use CrossFire on two R680s for its very high end in 2008. But what is this R680 really worth?




i wonder wat it would be like to run folding at home on. that would boost my skor lol
i will reserve judgement on the ultra vs 3870x2 until the first driver release after the official release of the card - think how much performance the 2900 xt gained! (not that i would expect anything like that much, but the ultra has had a year for it's drivers to mature)
Two chips and not even a beater of a single GTS and still no where near a card (the GTX) that has been out for almost a year. Come on ATI whats happenned.
Anand's shows the card in a better light, something about newer drivers i hear? Beating the GTS in most games with a largish margin
Is the R700 really delayed until 2009? I thought that rumour was dismissed...
"Anand's shows the card in a better light, something about newer drivers i hear? Beating the GTS in most games with a largish margin"
no it doesnt