Source: Tom's Hardware UK – Keywords: AMD, K10, architecture
Categories: Hardware
Introduction
Since the introduction of its K8 architecture in 2003, AMD has benefited from almost unprecedented success. This situation isn’t all that surprising to the general public, a market for which the K6 and the K7 had already instilled a certain credibility.
However, there was some shock in the professional market, where up until now Intel had reigned supreme. With this change a new market opened up to AMD where the volumes may have been sparse but the margins considerable. All was well for the Sunnyvale firm and it wasn’t the competition with multiple derivations of the Netburst architecture that was going to push the company to the state it’s in now.
This situation did see AMD slow down somewhat; the modifications to the K8 architecture are still largely incremental, apart from certain adjustments to the cache and the integrated memory controller, the architecture has been relatively unchanged since its debut. Of course, in between these small updates we had the appearance of dual-core processors but even then there were few changes to the K8 architecture. This leaves the door wide open for Intel to take the lead with regards performance.
This was particularly easy given the fact that Intel already possessed a modern architecture, a result of the major modifications brought to the P6 and which had itself known enormous success in the laptop market.
After a new series of improvements, the Core 2 architecture was born and, since its introduction a year ago, the situation was gradually degraded for AMD. AMD, beaten on the grounds of pure performance, then had to cut down on prices to remain in any way competitive.
Combined with a complicated fusion with ATI, business seems to be off to a bad start for AMD. The last hope seems to be the K10 architecture, combining 4 cores on one chip and the amelioration of the internal architecture of the cores. Will the first real update since the introduction of the K8 be sufficient to battle against the ogre that is Intel’s Core 2? Let’s not forget that Penryn, the update of the Core 2 is already inbound.
- Next page Barcelona: the overall picture
- Feeling the Squeeze: AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6400 Black Edition
- Can CPUs (Finally) Make PCs Faster as Well as Quieter?
- Overclocking to new limits: Testing the new Core 2 Stepping
- Do More Cores Beat More Clock Speed?
- Extreme FSB: Taking the E6750 Beyond 4 GHz
- Tom's Hardware's 2007 CPU Charts
- AMD's Smart Strike: Athlon X2 BE-2350
- Energy Efficiency Duel: Intel Left Out In The Cold
- Which is the Best Mainstream CPU?
- The Gigahertz Battle: How Do Today's CPUs Stack Up?

Why is the wording under the pictures in French?
It looks like the editor either hasn't been doing his/her job properly or is not a fluent English speaker. There are at least half a dozen spelling errors in this article, and the grammar is somewhat less than perfect!
Apart from that, an interesting read.
Re: "AMD K10: The Architecture of the Revival?"
Article compares apples and oranges. :-(
i.e. It would be fair to compare the memory architecture of Coppermine vs. Thunderbird, as an example of where AMD /romped/ ahead.
Go back to Tomshardwares own archives and compare those memory architectures.
Or as another example, compare Katmai with the original Slot-A Athlon K75.
Where's the definitive great chart of all (x86) CPUs gone? Where are the archives?? What happened to the once-great tomshardware.com????
Cheers!
Fragz.