Barcelona: the overall picture

Ad

K10 is AMD’s first quad-core architecture; the firm even speaks of native quad-core and insist that this point be noted. Unlike Intel’s Clovertown architecture, which integrates two dual-core processors in one package, AMD is following the Pentium D; Barcelona integrates the four cores on the same die. Apart from the elegance of this solution, we also note the advantage purely in terms of performance; communication between the four cores is done at the frequency of the CPU.

AMD K10 architecture

AMD’s approach is opposite to Intel’s; the Intel technique has the communications between the cores relying on their physical placement on the chip. Cores 1 and 2 or 3 and 4 can communicate quickly and effectively, but as soon as two cores that don’t share the same die must share information they must communicate through the memory controller which, on the Intel architectures, is still integrated with the northbridge.

This relatively simple information exchange generates two requests that pass by the Front Side Bus and so must be carried out at a reduced frequency. While it’s undeniable that the Clovertown is a quad-core processor, the distinction that AMD has made on this level was more a marketing decision than a technical choice: as long as there are 4 cores integrated in one processor there isn’t much room for discussion, the rest is really just details of implementation.

Unlike the previous transition to dual-core processors, this time AMD engineers didn’t stop there, they effectively have a budget of 463 million transistors with which to play one-up in an effort to improve the IPC (Instruction Per Clock) of each of its cores.

These improvements had positive effects on the overall processing pipeline: from the front end which reads and decodes instructions, to the execution units passing by the cache memory and the memory controller; there isn’t one part of the processor that hasn’t been remodelled for the K10 architecture.

AMD even goes so far as thinking that we are now faced with a tenth generation architecture, effectively jumping a stage because the Opteron and Athlon 64 were both eighth generation processors.


Ad
Talkback
JeanLuc 18/09/2007 03:00
Hide
-0+
JeanLuc

Why is the wording under the pictures in French?

MrRimmer 19/09/2007 11:31
Hide
-0+
MrRimmer

It looks like the editor either hasn't been doing his/her job properly or is not a fluent English speaker. There are at least half a dozen spelling errors in this article, and the grammar is somewhat less than perfect!
Apart from that, an interesting read.

Fragula 19/09/2007 12:00
Hide
-0+
Fragula

Re: "AMD K10: The Architecture of the Revival?"

Article compares apples and oranges. :-(

i.e. It would be fair to compare the memory architecture of Coppermine vs. Thunderbird, as an example of where AMD /romped/ ahead.

Go back to Tomshardwares own archives and compare those memory architectures.

Or as another example, compare Katmai with the original Slot-A Athlon K75.

Where's the definitive great chart of all (x86) CPUs gone? Where are the archives?? What happened to the once-great tomshardware.com????

Cheers!

Fragz.

Comments are closed on this page.
Google Ads
Ad