Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: 3DMark, Vantage, DirectX Category : CPU
Espoo (Finland) - Futuremark Corporation has released its 3DMark Vantage a benchmark that will surely be run thousands of times in the next few days. The DirectX 10.0 benchmark (yes, it uses 10.0, not 10.1) has native support for 32- and 64-bit mode and a host of other interesting features.
But in order to develop a benchmark that works natively with 32 threads (you can go all the way to quad-socket Bloomfield) and knows the difference between two and four gigabytes of system memory, Futuremark spent a small fortune - $5 million, that is.
Budget-wise, it costs more and more to produce a benchmark. PCMarkVantage ate a cool million dollars, while 3DMark05 and 3DMark06 each came with a price tag "millions of dollars" (3DMark05 = $2 million, 3DMark06 = $2 million).
We spoke with Oliver Baltuch, President of Futuremark Corporation. Oliver stated that the costs of developing benchmarks were going through the roof, and that was the main reason why the company changed the policy of charging for the basic multi-run version. The biggest issue Futuremark found was that companies were using the free version to advertise their systems, from AIB manufacturers to system integrators world-wise. Escalating costs were also one of reasons why Futuremark Gaming Studios was incorporated.
According to Futuremark, PCMarkVantage was one of the rare benchmarks that broke even financially. If 3DMarkVantage achieves a profit, it will be a major milestone for Futuremark, who will then have more resources to dedicate in order to make ultimate Windows 7 benchmark. Until that time, 3DMarkVantage is here to stay.
-
Previous News Article
European Union Launches Second... -
Next News Article
Eidos To Cut Entire U.S. Sales And...
- AMD "Puma" Can't Compete With Core 2 Duo
- DoD Has Concerns Over Apple's Purchase Of P.A Semi
- AMD: CPUs, GPUs, Layoffs and The Enemy
- Apple To Acquire Multi-Core Processor Developer PA Semi
- AMD Picks Up CPU Market Share In Q4 2007
- Concurrent Programming: A Solution For Multi-core Era?
- AMD Asset Smart Caught In A Catch 22
- AMD Reports Another Hefty Loss: $358 Million In Q1
- Analysis: AMD Asset Lite Strategy Will Create MAD AMD
- Intel takes aim at AMD's cash cow
i would buy it, but tell me this the majority of people interested in it are gamers... the majority of gamers use windows XP which does not support DX10... anyone else see a problem?