Benchmark Results - Expendable - 1024x768x16
07:00 - Monday 6 September 1999 by Silvino Orozco
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Table of content:
Benchmark Results - Expendable - 1024x768x16
Ad

The Hercules TNT2 Ultra and the Xentor32 pull ahead once again followed closely by the G400 MAX, Voodoo3's and the top few TNT2's. Acceptable performance levels drop at about the X-Demon. You must be wondering why the Diamond V770 cards don't have scores. Every time I tried to run these cards at the 1024x768x16 setting, the benchmark crashed and put me back at the desktop. The weird part was that I was able to run the tests at 1024x768x32 just fine. After attempting to use the NVIDIA reference driver, I was able to make the cards work just fine at that setting. I hope Diamond looks into this problem before anyone else gets upset.
- Previous page Benchmark Results - Expendable -...
- Next page Benchmark Results - Expendable -...
Google Ads
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
- 3dfx, Matrox and Nvidia take on the KryoTech Cool Athlon 800MHz
- 32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part One
- 3D Chips and Cards
- Comparison of Graphics Cards with NVIDIA's RIVA TNT Chip
- Voodoo² Accelerator Review September 1998
- Graphic Chips Review April 98
- Creative Labs 3D Blaster Voodoo2
- 3D Accelerator Review Step One - 3D Performance, the Real Deal
- 3D Accelerator Card Reviews
- Review AGP Graphic Cards
Related Content