Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1024x768x16
07:00 - Monday 6 September 1999 by Silvino Orozco
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Source: Tom's Hardware – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Table of content:
Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1024x768x16
Ad

As we start to make things harder on the video cards, we can now see the powerhouses flex their muscles. With superior clock speeds the Hercules TNT2 Ultra and the Xentor32 take the leading spots. Most of the TNT2/Ultra cards follow the pack leaders as well as the Voodoo3 3500 and Matrox G400 MAX. Looking down the chart we see the acceptable performance drop off at the ATI AIW 128. In the Shogo test, we can already see that after 640x480 the Savage4 cards aren't cutting it anymore. If you're looking for DX performance above 640x480 then the Savage4 won't probably be your card of choice.
- Previous page Benchmark Results - Shogo - 640x480x16
- Next page Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1600x1200x16
Google Ads
The Graphics Cards Articles and reviews
- 3dfx, Matrox and Nvidia take on the KryoTech Cool Athlon 800MHz
- 32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part One
- 3D Chips and Cards
- Comparison of Graphics Cards with NVIDIA's RIVA TNT Chip
- Voodoo² Accelerator Review September 1998
- Graphic Chips Review April 98
- Creative Labs 3D Blaster Voodoo2
- 3D Accelerator Review Step One - 3D Performance, the Real Deal
- 3D Accelerator Card Reviews
- Review AGP Graphic Cards
Related Content